DOI
https://doi.org/10.18849/ve.v6i1.464Abstract
2020 will be a year to remember! One of the standout features for me has been the speed with which ‘science’ has responded to the crisis in terms of developing and disseminating new information to the community highlighting the importance of digital communication – a space that Veterinary Evidence comfortably occupies. The availability of pre peer-reviewed papers has become the norm but it has also emphasised the essential need and benefit of the peer-review process as a significant number of pre-review papers have not made it through to ‘publication’ as issues were identified during the peer-review process.
As Editor-in-chief it makes me proud and thankful that Veterinary Evidence has a strong but agile peer-review process and I would like to thank all of our editors and reviewers for their continued support and their diligence in meeting demanding timelines during these challenging times allowing Veterinary Evidence to publish more content than ever before. Without your highly valued knowledge, expertise and insights Veterinary Evidence would not be growing into the key knowledge source that it is today.
The Veterinary Evidence Editorial Board Meeting was held for the first time digitally on 7 December with the largest number of editorial board members able to attend. Members from across the globe were able to take part in wide and varied discussions around the development of the journal, resulting in important strategic initiatives and some key action points to pursue. The availability of the board to attend digitally will facilitate more frequent meetings allowing the journal to be more inclusive, and responsive to the changing landscape, as well as providing a digital recording of the event available for those board members unable to attend.
Key areas discussed included development of the format of PICOs and further refining the process for approving them, strategies to encourage engagement and submissions from veterinary nurses, and the development of policies to encourage diversity and inclusion within the board and contributors to the journal, as well as ways to increase the reach of the journal. Having only been Editor-in-chief since September, I have been very impressed by how active and dedicated our reviewers and board members are and how dynamic and forward-looking Veterinary Evidence is as it matures into a key contributor to veterinary literature. None of this would be possible without your support for which I am very grateful.
Within the Full Text you can see the names of all of our 2020 reviewers. Thank you to all who have contributed.
License
Veterinary Evidence uses the Creative Commons copyright Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. That means users are free to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially - with the appropriate citation.
Similar Articles
- Nieky van Veggel, James Oxley, In Dogs Does Feeding Raw Dietary Treats Reduce or Prevent Periodontal Disease? , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 3 No. 3 (2018): The third issue of 2018
- Erik Fausak, Elizabeth Rodriguez, Anna Elizabeth Simle, Netwarat Merman, Dakota Cook, Does the Use of Intratesticular Blocks in Cats Undergoing Orchiectomies Serve as an Effective Adjunctive Analgesic? , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 3 No. 4 (2018): The fourth issue of 2018
- Erik Davis Fausak, Elizabeth Rodriguez, Anna Elizabeth Simle, Netwarat Merman, Dakota Cook, Does the Use of Intratesticular Blocks in Dogs Undergoing Orchiectomies Serve as an Effective Adjunctive Analgesic? , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 3 No. 4 (2018): The fourth issue of 2018
- Elena Gogua, There is no evidence that the addition of antimicrobials reduce the risk of sepsis after intra-articular corticosteroids in horses with arthritis , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 5 No. 1 (2020): The first issue of 2020
- Sara Silva, L. Miguel Carreira, Telmo Nunes, François Saulnier-Troff, A critical appraisal of the literature exploring the surgical treatment of degenerative lumbosacral stenosis in dogs , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 5 No. 2 (2020): The second issue of 2020
- Lesca Monica Sofyan, In dogs diagnosed with osteoarthritis, is meloxicam superior to carprofen for reducing patient discomfort? , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 5 No. 3 (2020): The third issue of 2020
- Leanne Barry, In dogs undergoing anaesthesia do pre-anaesthetic gastroprotectants reduce gastro-oesophageal reflux? , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 5 No. 4 (2020): The fourth issue of 2020
- Lara Brunori, Does ranitidine administration improve gastrointestinal hypomotility in dogs? , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 6 No. 1 (2021): The first issue of 2021
- Lesca Monica Sofyan, Are glucocorticoids or NSAIDs more effective in reducing idiopathic feline urinary tract disease signs than no treatment or placebo? , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 6 No. 3 (2021): The third issue of 2021
- Michael Glover, Neil Blake, Clare Phythian, Impacts of Schmallenberg virus infection in early lambing sheep flocks following the second wave of virus circulation in South West England in 2012/2013: a mixed-methods descriptive study , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 8 No. 1 (2023): The first issue of 2023
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Kit Sturgess, Thank you to our 2021 reviewers , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 7 No. 1 (2022): The first issue of 2022
- Kit Sturgess, Thank you to our reviewers 2022 , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 8 No. 1 (2023): The first issue of 2023
- Kit Sturgess, Thank you to our reviewers 2023 , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 9 No. 1 (2024): The first issue of 2024