DOI
https://doi.org/10.18849/ve.v3i4.160Abstract
PICO question
In cats undergoing orchiectomy, does the use of intratesticular lidocaine reduce the pain in patients compared to not using intratesticular lidocaine?
Clinical bottom line
With a low grade of evidence, when compared to a pre-medication with pure-µ agonist opioids, intratesticular lidocaine does not appear to provide significant benefit. However, based on our clinical scenario where pre-medication is with a partial-µ opioid like buprenorphine, there may be benefit in utilising intratesticular lidocaine.
References
Fernandez-Parra, R. et al. (2017) ‘Comparison of intratesticular lidocaine, sacrococcygeal epidural lidocaine and intravenous methadone in cats undergoing castration: a prospective, randomized, investigator-blind clinical trial’, Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaa.2016.03.010
Huuskonen, V. et al. (2013) ‘Intratesticular lidocaine reduces the response to surgical castration in dogs’, Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia, 40(1), pp. 74–82. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2995.2012.00775.x
McMillan, M. W., Seymour, C. J. and Brearley, J. C. (2012) ‘Effect of intratesticular lidocaine on isoflurane requirements in dogs undergoing routine castration’, Journal of Small Animal Practice, 53(7), pp. 393–397. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5827.2012.01233.x
Moldal, E. R. et al. (2013) ‘Intratesticular and subcutaneous lidocaine alters the intraoperative haemodynamic responses and heart rate variability in male cats undergoing castration’, Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia, 40(1), pp. 63–73. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2995.2012.00773.x
Perez, T. E. et al. (2013) ‘Effects of intratesticular injection of bupivacaine and epidural administration of morphine in dogs undergoing castration’, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 242(5), pp. 631–642. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2460/javma.242.5.631
Additional Files
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Erik Davis Fausak, Elizabeth Rodriguez, Anna Elizabeth Simle, Netwarat Merman, Dakota Cook
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Veterinary Evidence uses the Creative Commons copyright Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. That means users are free to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially - with the appropriate citation.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Erik Davis Fausak, Elizabeth Rodriguez, Anna Elizabeth Simle, Netwarat Merman, Dakota Cook, Does the Use of Intratesticular Blocks in Dogs Undergoing Orchiectomies Serve as an Effective Adjunctive Analgesic? , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 3 No. 4 (2018): The fourth issue of 2018
- Erik Fausak, Melissa C. Funaro, Andrea C. Kepsel, Erin R.B. Eldermire, Margaret Foster, Hannah F. Norton, Kim Mears, Molly E. Crews, Marnie Brennan, Gillian L. Currie, Megan R. LaFollette, Annette O’Connor, Adrian J. Smith, Kimberley E. Wever, Suzanne Fricke, Systematic reviews of animal studies – Report of an international symposium , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 8 No. 3 (2023): The third issue of 2023
- Laura Shultz, Erik Fausak, Borrelia burgdorferi exposure in coyotes: an indicator of B. burgdorferi levels in urban versus rural environments , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 7 No. 1 (2022): The first issue of 2022