DOI
https://doi.org/10.18849/ve.v6i2.344Abstract
PICO question
In routine canine caesareans, is alfaxalone a superior anaesthetic induction agent than propofol in increasing the rate of survival and vigour of neonates?
Clinical bottom line
Category of research question
Treatment
The number and type of study designs reviewed
Three randomised positive clinical trials have compared the efficacy between alfaxalone and propofol in routine canine caesarean sections for increased neonatal survival and vigour
Strength of evidence
Weak
Outcomes reported
Although two studies found alfaxalone to be associated with higher Apgar scores for neonates than propofol, each study nonetheless revealed positive vigour and high survival rates from the use of either alfaxalone or propofol. The evidence is too weak to suggest that one induction agent is superior to another. The selection between the two induction agents may not be the main concern in regard to neonatal depression and 24 hour survival post-delivery, provided that the entire canine caesarean protocol is thoroughly and carefully studied
Conclusion
The evidence is too weak to suggest that alfaxolone or propofol is superior to another during canine cesareans. There is no signifcant difference seen in neonatal survival rate and vigour when using either alfaxolone or propofol
How to apply this evidence in practice
The application of evidence into practice should take into account multiple factors, not limited to: individual clinical expertise, patient’s circumstances and owners’ values, country, location or clinic where you work, the individual case in front of you, the availability of therapies and resources.
Knowledge Summaries are a resource to help reinforce or inform decision making. They do not override the responsibility or judgement of the practitioner to do what is best for the animal in their care.
References
Onclin, K.J. & Verstegen, J.P. (2008). Cesarean Section in the Dog. Clinician’s brief. 72–78.
Pascoe, P.J. & Moon, P.F. (2001). Periparturient and neonatal anaesthesia. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice. 31(2), 315–341. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-5616(01)50208-9
World Small Animal Veterinary Association Global Veterinary Community. Cesarean section.
Paddleford, R.R. (2016). Anesthesia for Ceserean Section in the Dog. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice. 22(2), 481–484. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-5616(92)50678-7
Sams, L., Braun, C., Allman, D. & Hofmeister, E. (2008). A comparison of the effects of propofol and etomidate on the induction of anaesthesia and on cardiopulmonary parameters in dogs. Veterinary Anaesthesisa and Analgesia. 35(6), 488–494.DOI: http://doi.org/ 1111/j.1467-2995.2008.00417.x
Luna, S.P.L., Cassu, R.N., Castro, G.B., Teixeira Neto, F.J., Silva Júnior, J.R. & Lopes, M.D. (2004). Effects of four anaesthetic protocols on the neurological and cardiorespiratory variable of puppies born by caesarean section. Veterinary Record. 154(13), 387–389. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.154.13.387
Moon, P.F., Erb, H.N., Ludders, J.W., Gleed, R.D & Pascoe, P.J. (2000). Perioperative risk factors for puppies delivered by cesarean section in the United States and Canada. Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association. 36(4), 359–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5326/15473317-36-4-359
Jurox Animal Health. (2013). What is Alfaxan®? Alfaxan (alfaxalone 10 mg/mL). Available at: https://jurox.com/sites/default/files/resources/juroxinc_alfaxan_whatisalfaxan_ipad.pdf [Accessed May 2019].
Brewster, M.E., Estes, K.S. & Bodor, N. (1989). Development of a non-surfactant formulation for alfaxalone through use of chemically-modified cyclodextrins. Journal of Parenteral Science and Technology. 43(6), 262–265.
Maney, J.K., Shepard, M.K., Braun, C., Cremer, J. & Hofmeister, E.H. (2013). A comparison of cardiopulmonary and anesthetic effects of an induction dose of alfaxalone or propofol in dogs. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia. 40(3), 237–244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/vaa.1200
Kanto, J.H. (1988). Propofol, the newest induction agent of anesthesia. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Therapy and Toxicology. 26(1), 41–57.
Vilar, J.M., Batista, M., Perez, R., Zagorskaia, A., Jouanisson, E., Díaz-Bertrana, & Rosales, S. (2018). Comparison of 3 anesthestic protocols for the elective cesarean-section in the dog: Effects on the bitch and the newborn puppies. Animal Reproduction Science. 190, 53–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2018.01.007
Ruiz, C.C., Del Carro, A.P., Rosset, E., Guyot, E., Maroiller, L., Buff, S. & Portier, K. (2016). Alfaxalone for total intravenous anaesthesia in bitches undergoing elective caesarean section and its effects on puppies: a randomized clinical trial. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia. 43(3), 281–290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/vaa.12298
Metcalfe, S., Hulands-Nave, A., Bell, M., Kidd, C., Pasloske, K., O’Hagan, B., Perkins, N. & Whittem, T. (2014). Multicentre, randomised clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of alfaxalone administered to bitches for induction of anaesthesia prior to caesarean section. Australian Veterinary Journal. 92(9), 333–338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/avj.12223
Doebeli, A., Michel, E., Bettschart, R. Hartnack, S. & Reichler, I.M. (2013). Apgar score after induction of anesthesia for canine cesarean section with alfaxalone versus propofol. 80(8), 850–854. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2013.07.006
Callander,, Antsey, A.V., Ingram, J.R., Limpens, J., Flohr, C. & Spuls, P.I. (2017). How to write a Critically Appraised Topic: evidence to underpin routine clinical practice. British Journal of Dermatology. 177(4), 1007–1013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.15873
Bang, H., Ni, L. & Clarence, E.D. (2004). Assessment of blinding in clinical trials. Control Clinical Trials. 25(2), 143–156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2003.10.016
Juni, P., Altman, D.G. & Egger, M. (2001). Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. 323, 42–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7303.42
Nayak, B.K. (2010).Understanding the relevance of sample size calculation. Indian Journal of Opthalmology. 58(6) , 469–470. DOI: https://doi.org/ 4103/0301-4738.71673
Mila, H., Grellet, A., Delebarre, M., Mariani, C., Feugier, A. & Chastant-Maillard, S. (2017). Monitoring of the newborn dog and prediction of neonatal mortality. Preventive Veterinary Medicine. 143, 11–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.05.005
Veronesi, M.C. (2016). Assessment of canine neonatal viability – the Apgar score. Reproduction in Domestic Animals. 51(S1), 46–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.12787
Groppetti, D., Pecile, A., Del Carro, A.P., Copley, K., Minero, M. & Cremonesi, F. (2010). Evaluation of newborn canine viability by means of umbilical vein lactate measurement, apgar score and uterine tocodynamometry. 74(7), 1187–1196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.05.020
WSAVA Global Pain Council Pain Management Protocol. (2014). Caesarean section. Journal of Small Animal Practice. I55, E10–E68.
Bolis, B., Prandi, A., Rota, A., Faustini, M. & Veronesi, M.C. (2017). Cortisol fetal fluid concentrations in term pregnancy of small-sized purebred dogs and its preliminary relation to first 24 hours survival of newborns. 88, 264–269. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.09.037
Melandri, M., Alonge, S., Peric, T., Bolis, B. & Veronesi, M.C. (2019). Effects of Alfaxalone or Propofol on Giant-Breed Dog Neonates Viability During Elective Caesarean Section. 9(11), 962. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9110962
De Cramer, K.G.M., Joubert, K.E. & Nöthling, J.O. (2017). Puppy survival and vigor associated with the use of low dose medetomidine premedication, propofol induction and maintenance of anesthesia using sevoflurane gas-inhalation for cesarean section in the bitch. Theriogenology. 96, 10–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.03.021
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Lesca Monica Sofyan, Fernando Martinez Taboada
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Veterinary Evidence uses the Creative Commons copyright Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. That means users are free to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially - with the appropriate citation.
Similar Articles
- Benjamin Haythornthwaite, Comparison of the safety of alfaxalone and propofol as anaesthetic induction agents in bitches undergoing c-section , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 5 No. 3 (2020): The third issue of 2020
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Lesca Monica Sofyan, In dogs diagnosed with osteoarthritis, is meloxicam superior to carprofen for reducing patient discomfort? , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 5 No. 3 (2020): The third issue of 2020
- Lesca Monica Sofyan, Are glucocorticoids or NSAIDs more effective in reducing idiopathic feline urinary tract disease signs than no treatment or placebo? , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 6 No. 3 (2021): The third issue of 2021
- Adrian Wong, Fernando Martinez-Taboada, In dogs with osteoarthritis, how effective is treatment with tramadol in providing analgesia? , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 6 No. 2 (2021): The second issue of 2021
