DOI
https://doi.org/10.18849/ve.v2i2.122Abstract
Introduction: In order to practice evidence-based veterinary medicine, good quality clinical evidence needs to be produced, in order that it can be apprasied systematically by the EBVM network, and used by vets. There is very little good-quality veterinary evidence for most of the veterinary procedures carried out every day across the world. Very few, if any, individuals have all the necessary qualities (case-load, time, research expertise, financial support) to be able to systematically produce good-quality, and relevant, clinical research on their own, in a timely manner. The Association for Veterinary Soft Tissue Surgery (AVSTS) www.avsts.org.uk is an affiliate group with the British Small Animal Veterinary Association (BSAVA), and functions as a clinical network of like-minded individuals. In 2013 AVSTS sought to create a role for itself in facilitating the production (by its members) of multi-centre clinical research of relevance to its members.
Materials and methods: Members of AVSTS were asked to join the AVSTS Research Cooperative (ARC), with a veterinary epidemiologist and an experienced multi-centre veterinary clinical researcher (to help with study design and statistical planning), and the Animal Health Trust clinical research ethics committee. An email list was established, and a page was set up on the AVSTS website, to allow information to be disseminated. The AVSTS spring and autumn meetings were used as a regular forum by ARC, to discuss its direction, to generate interest, to create and promote specific studies (in order to widen participation amongst different centres), and to update members about previous studies.
Results: Membership of ARC has grown to 224 people, although the epidemiologist left. One multi-centre study has been published, two have been presented and await publication, one has been accepted for presentation, two other studies are gathering data at present, and further studies are in the pipeline. There has been interest from general practitioner members but as yet no studies of general practice procedures have been forthcoming.
Discussion: Vets want to be involved with clinical research. ARC has had early successes and will continue to grow - though more work is needed to encourage general practitioner members. Multi-centre research allows more cases to be recruited more quickly, adding weight to studies and shortening the period of data-gathering. These initial retrospective studies have generated a committed core of individuals seeking to create prospective studies together. An online tool is planned, to facilitate real-time case-recruitment
for prospective multi-centre studies including randomised controlled trials. Anyone can join ARC, please email inicholsonvet@gmail.com.
References
NA
License
Veterinary Evidence uses the Creative Commons copyright Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. That means users are free to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially - with the appropriate citation.
Similar Articles
- Kristen Reyher, The Global Resource for Online Evidence-Based Veterinary Medicine Learning , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 2 No. 1 (2017): The first issue of 2017
- Tierney Kinnison, Stephen A May, Evidence-Based Healthcare: The Importance of Effective Interprofessional Working for High Quality Veterinary Services, a UK Example , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 1 No. 4 (2016): Our fourth issue
- David Mills, Putting the Horse Before the Cart: the Ethical Case for Animal Patient Values in EBVM , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 2 No. 2 (2017): The second issue of 2017
- Sarah Allen, Dave Brodbelt, Josh Slater, Kristien Verheyen, Generating Evidence Through Practice-based Equine Health Surveillance , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 1 No. 4 (2016): Our fourth issue
- Bradley Viner, Embedding EBVM into Practice , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 2 No. 1 (2017): The first issue of 2017
- Dan O'Neill, Effective Dissemination - Building an 'Evidence to Impact' Strategy , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 2 No. 1 (2017): The first issue of 2017
- Steve Budsberg, David Church, Can Practice-Based Evidence Complement and Promote EBVM? , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 1 No. 4 (2016): Our fourth issue
- Mark Holmes, How to Design a Study in Practice , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 1 No. 2 (2016): Our second issue
- David Mills, Diagnostic Accuracy: The Wellspring of EBVM Success, and How We Can Improve It , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 2 No. 3 (2017): The third issue of 2017
- Mark Turner, Mistakes, Errors and Foul-Ups: Practice-Based Evidence for Evidence Based Practice , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 1 No. 4 (2016): Our fourth issue
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.