DOI
https://doi.org/10.18849/ve.v11i1.729Abstract
Question
In healthy dogs undergoing general anaesthesia is rapid infusion of propofol compared to slow infusion of propofol associated with a greater incidence or duration of post-induction apnoea?
Clinical bottom line
Category of research:
Treatment.
Number and type of study designs reviewed:
Four prospective, randomised, controlled clinical trials.
Strength of evidence:
Weak.
Outcomes reported:
The studies have produced inconsistent findings regarding the relationship between propofol infusion speed and post-induction apnoea appearance in dogs. While two studies have found that increasing the speed of administration increases the incidence or duration of post-induction apnoea, other studies have not found a significant correlation.
Conclusion:
Based on available evidence, administering propofol at a slow rate is unlikely to lower the incidence or duration of post-induction apnoea compared with faster propofol infusion where the total dose is kept constant. However, administering propofol slowly is recommended when titrating to effect, since slow administration reduces the total dose required to induce anaesthesia, thereby reducing the risk of apnoea.
References
Aun, C.S.T., Short, S.M., Leung, D.H.Y. & Oh, T.E. (1992). Induction dose-response of propofol in unpremedicated children. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 68(1), 64–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/68.1.64
Bhide, A., Shah, P.S. & Acharya, G. (2018). A simplified guide to randomized controlled trials. Methodology in Clinical Epidemiological Research in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 97(4), 380–387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13309
Bigby, S.E. (2018). A comparison of the incidence of apnoea following induction of anaesthesia with propofol or alfaxalone in dogs. MVSc Thesis (Clinical), The University of Melbourne. [Online] Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/11343/214486 [Accessed 16 February 2025].
Bigby, S.E., Beths, T., Bauquier, S. & Carter, J.E. (2017a). Effect of rate of administration of propofol or alfaxalone on induction dose requirements and occurrence of apnea in dogs. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia. 44(6), 1267–1275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaa.2017.03.005
Bigby, S.E., Beths, T., Bauquier, S. & Carter, J.E. (2017b). Postinduction apnoea in dogs premedicated with acepromazine or dexmedetomidine and anaesthetized with alfaxalone or propofol. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia. 44(5), 1007–1015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaa.2016.10.004
Cattai, A., Rabozzi, R., Ferasin, H., Isola, M. & Franci, P. (2018). Haemodynamic changes during propofol induction in dogs: new findings and approach of monitoring. BMC Veterinary Research. 14, 282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-018-1608-8
Cochrane, S. (2007). Management of Status Epilepticus in the Dog and Cat. In: World Small Animal Veterinary Association World Congress Proceedings, 19-23 August 2007, Sydney [Online]. Available from: https://www.vin.com/doc/?id=3860886 [Accessed 16 February 2025].
Cuniberti, B., Huuskonen, V. & Hughes, J.M.L. (2023). Comparison between continuous rate infusion and target-controlled infusion of propofol in dogs: a randomized clinical trial. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia. 50(1), 21–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaa.2021.08.048
Dunlop, C. (2014). Inhalation Anaesthesia Agents. In: World Small Animal Veterinary Association World Congress Proceedings, 16-19 September 2014, Cape Town [Online]. Available at: https://www.vin.com/doc/?id=7054802 [Accessed 16 February 2025].
Freire, C., Sennes, L.U. & Polotsky, V.Y. (2022). Opioids and obstructive sleep apnea. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine. 18(2), 647–652. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.9730
Glowaski, M.M. & Wetmore, L.A. (1999). Propofol: application in veterinary sedation and anesthesia. Clinical Techniques in Small Animal Practice. 14(1), 1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-2867(99)80021-8
Gruenheid, M., Aarnes, T.K., McLoughlin, M.A., Simpson, E.M., Mathys, D.A., Mollenkopf, D.F. & Wittum, T.E. (2018). Risk of anesthesia-related complications in brachycephalic dogs. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 253(3), 301–306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.253.3.301
Hariton, E. & Locascio, J.J. (2018). Randomised controlled trials – the gold standard for effectiveness research. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 125(13), 1716. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15199
Keates, H. & Whittem, T. (2012). Effect of intravenous dose escalation with alfaxalone and propofol on occurrence of apnoea in the dog. Research in Veterinary Science. 93(2), 904–906. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2011.10.003
Khojasteh, K. & Vesal, N. (2023). Comparison of propofol infusion rate required to abolish swallowing or pedal withdrawal reflexes in dogs. Veterinary Research Forum. 14(2), 79–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30466/vrf.2021.537306.3220
Maiante, A.A., Teixeira Neto, F.J., Beier, S.L., Corrente, J.E. & Pedroso, C.E.B.P. (2009). Comparison of the cardio-respiratory effects of methadone and morphine in conscious dogs. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 32(4), 317–328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2885.2008.01042.x
Muir, W.W. III & Gadawski, J.E. (1998). Respiratory depression and apnea induced by propofol in dogs. American Journal of Veterinary Research. 59(2), 157–161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.1998.59.02.157
Murison, P.J. (2001). Effect of propofol at two injection rates or thiopentone on post-intubation apnoea in the dog. Journal of Small Animal Practice. 42(2), 71–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5827.2001.tb01995.x
Musk, G.C, Pang, D.S.J., Beths, T. & Flaherty, D.A. (2005). Target-controlled infusion of propofol in dogs – evaluation of four targets for induction of anaesthesia. Veterinary Record. 157(24), 766–770. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.157.24.766
Orser, B.A., Bertlik, M., Wang, L. & MacDonald, J.F. (1995). Inhibition by propofol (2,6 di-isopropylphenol) of the N-methyl-D-aspartate subtype of glutamate receptor in cultured hippocampal neurones. British Journal of Pharmacology. 116(2), 1761–1768. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.1995.tb16660.x
Park, Y.S., Choi, I.H. & Kim, J.H. (1997). Duration and Frequency of Apnea and Frequency of Unconsciousness with Propofol according to Single Injection Dosage. Korean Journal of Anaesthesiology. 32(5), 829–834. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.1997.32.5.829
Raillard, M., Love, E.J. & Murison, P.J. (2018). Effect of predosing versus slow administration of propofol on the dose required for anaesthetic induction and on physiologic variables in healthy dogs. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia. 45(4), 414–422. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaa.2018.02.004
Rögels, H & Martinez-Taboada, F. (2021). Dose requirement and cardiopulmonary effects of diluted and undiluted propofol for induction of anaesthesia in dogs. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia. 48(2), 247–251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaa.2020.10.008
Sargeant, J.M., Kelton, D.F. & O’Connor A.M. (2014). Randomized Controlled Trials and Challenge Trials: Design and Criterion for Validity. Zoonoses and Public Health. 61(S1), 18–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/zph.12126
Smith J., Gaynor J., Bednarski, R. & Muir, W. (1993). Adverse effects of administration of propofol with various preanesthetic regimens in dogs. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 202(7), 1111–1115.
Taenzer, A.H. & Havidich, J.E. (2018). The Postanaesthesia Care Unit and Beyond. In: C.J. Coté, J. Lerman, & B.J. Anderson, eds. A Practice of Anaesthesia for Infants and Children, 6th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier, 1095–1108.
Walters, K., Lehnus, K., Liu, N. & Bigby, S.E. (2022). Determining an optimum propofol infusion rate for induction of anaesthesia in healthy dogs: a randomized clinical trial. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia. 49(3), 243–250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaa.2021.07.006
Zoetis. (2022). PropoFloTM (propofol injectable emulsion) Intravenous Anaesthetic Injection for Use in Dogs. Available at: https://www.zoetisus.com/content/_assets/docs/Petcare/propoflo-pi.pdf [Accessed 16 February 2025].
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Alexandra Fraser, Eduardo Uquillas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Veterinary Evidence uses the Creative Commons copyright Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. That means users are free to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially - with the appropriate citation.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Tracy Yeung, Eduardo Uquillas, Does oral cannabidiol oil in adjunct to pain medications help reduce pain and improve locomotion in dogs with osteoarthritis? , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): The first issue of 2025
- Alexandra Robinson, Tsim Christopher Sun, Eduardo Uquillas, In horses undergoing volatile anaesthesia, is recovery quality superior with sevoflurane compared to isoflurane? , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 8 No. 1 (2023): The first issue of 2023
