DOI
https://doi.org/10.18849/ve.v10i1.700Abstract
Question
In dogs diagnosed with medial coronoid disease, does arthroscopic surgical intervention, compared with conservative management, result in improved mobility and reduced pain?
Clinical bottom line
Category of research:
Treatment.
Number and type of study designs reviewed:
Three studies were identified directly addressing the PICO question. One paper was a retrospective cohort study, another study was a prospective randomised control trial, and the third was a non-randomised non-blinded observational study.
Strength of evidence:
Weak.
Outcomes reported:
The first study was a prospective non-randomised study that did not identify a difference in gait evaluation at the 52 week recheck in dogs treated conservatively compared to those treated arthroscopically, with lameness exacerbated in the arthroscopic treatment group until the 26 week recheck. The second study, a retrospective non-randomised cohort study, showed greater, but not statistically different, owner-reported clinical metrology scores in dogs treated arthroscopically compared to those treated conservatively. Liverpool Osteoarthritis in Dogs (LOAD) and Pain Severity Scores (PSS) were higher but not statistically significant, yet Pain Interference Scores (PIS) were statistically significantly higher at 52 weeks in arthroscopically treated dogs compared to conservatively treated dogs. Age at diagnosis and at time of questionnaire completion were statistically significant for LOAD, PSS, and PIS, with older dogs having higher scores. The third study performed a non-blinded observational study assessing canine patients with bilateral medial coronoid disease, with unilateral arthroscopic subtotal coronoidectomy performed on the most clinically affected limb. Radiographs and computed tomography (CT) imaging were performed at diagnosis, with radiographs taken at follow-up. At the time of follow-up, arthroscopically treated limbs had a higher radiographic score than those treated conservatively, although a significant improvement in lameness was seen at the walk in arthroscopically treated limbs. Conservatively managed dogs showed an unchanged (non-significant) gait. Radiographic changes did not appear to correlate to severity of clinical signs.
Conclusion:
The quality of the published evidence available to answer the PICO question is weak, due to the design of the three reviewed studies. Low patient populations in these three studies also hinder the statistical power of any recommendations made. None of the three studies assesses the complex nature of medial coronoid disease to clearly answer the question posed. The decision to recommend arthroscopy over conservative management therefore depends on the judgement and experience of the veterinary surgeon attending the case. Additionally, assessment of the imaging findings is important when discussing prospective treatment options.
References
Alves, J.C., Jorge, P. & Santos, A. (2022). Initial psychometric evaluation of the Portuguese version of the Liverpool Osteoarthritis in Dogs. BMC Veterinary Research. 18, 367. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-022-03461-8
Barthélèmey, N.P., Griffon, D.J., Ragetly, G.R., Carrera, I. & Schaeffer, D.J. (2014). Short- and Long-Term Outcomes After Arthroscopic Treatment of Young Large Breed Dogs with Medial Compartment Disease of the Elbow. Veterinary Surgery. 43(8), 935–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2014.12255.x
Benito, J., DePuy, V., Hardie, E., Zamprogno, H., Thomson, A., Simpson, W., Roe, S., Hansen, B. & Lascelles, B.D.X. (2013). Reliability and discriminatory testing of a client-based metrology instrument, feline musculoskeletal pain index (FMPI) for the evaluation of degenerative joint disease-associated pain in cats. The Veterinary Journal. 196(3), 368–373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.12.015
Bouck, G.R., Miller, C.W. & Taves, C.L. (1995). A Comparison of Surgical and Medical Treatment of Fragmented Coronoid Process and Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Canine Elbow. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 8(4), 177–183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1632452
Brown, D.C., Boston, R.C., Coyne, J.C. & Farrar, J.T. (2007). Development and psychometric testing of an instrument designed to measure chronic pain in dogs with osteoarthritis. American Journal of Veterinary Research. 68(6), 631–637. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.68.6.631
Burton, N.J., Owen, M.R., Kirk, L.S, Toscano, M.J. & Colborne, G.R. (2011). Conservative Versus Arthroscopic Management of Medial Coronoid Process Disease in Dogs: A Prospective Gait Evaluation. Veterinary Surgery. 40(8), 972–980. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2011.00900.x
Burton, N.J. (2023). Review of minimally invasive surgical procedures for assessment and treatment of medial coronoid process disease. Veterinary Surgery. 52(6), 790–800. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.13986
Coppieters, E., Seghers, H., Verhoeven, G., Gielen, I., Samoy, Y., Bakker, E.de, & van Ryssen, B. (2016). Arthroscopic, Computed Tomography and Radiographic Findings in 25 dogs with Lameness After Arthroscopic Treatment of Medial Coronoid Disease. Veterinary Surgery. 45(2), 246–253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.12443
Cruz, A.M.M. & Mason, D.R. (2022). Owner assessed outcomes following elbow arthroscopic with or without platelet rich plasma for fragmented medial coronoid process. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.938706
Dempsey, L.M., Maddox, T.W., Comerford, E.J., Pettitt, R.A. & Tomlinson, A.W. (2019). A Comparison of Owner-Assessed Long-Term Outcome of Arthroscopic Intervention Versus Conservative Management of Dogs with Medial Coronoid Disease. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 32(1), 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org./10.1055/s-0038-1676293
Evans, R.B., Gordon-Evans, W.J. & Conzemius, M.G. (2008) Comparison of three methods for the management of fragmented medial coronoid process in the dogs: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 21(2), 106–9.
Farrell, M., Kowaleski, M. & von Pfeil, D. (2018). Canine elbow arthroscopy: A dog owner’s guide. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HRKbWxD91Sk [Accessed 8 November 2023].
Galindo-Zamora, V., Dziallas, P., Wolf, D.C., Kramer, S., Abdelhadi, J., Lucas, K., Nolte, I. & Wefstaedt, P. (2014). Evaluation of Thoracic Limb Loads, Elbow Movement and Morphology in Dogs Before and After Arthroscopic Management of Unilateral Medial Coronoid Process Disease. Veterinary Surgery. 43(7), 819–829. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2014.12250.x
Garnier, P., Dekerle, B., Vial, J., Maurice, E., Manassero, M, & Viateau, V. (2023). Evaluation of a small-bore needle arthroscope for diagnosis and treatment of medial coronoid disease in dogs: a pilot study with short-term assessment. New Zealand Veterinary Journal. 71(3), 152–158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00480169.2023.2181239
Hercock, C.A., Pinchbeck, G., Giejda, A., Clegg, P.D. & Innes, J.F. (2009). Validation of a client-based clinical metrology instrument for the evaluation of canine elbow osteoarthritis. Journal of Small Animal Practice. 50(6), 266–271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5827.2009.00765.x
Huibregtse, B.A., Johnson, A.L., Muhlbauer, M.C., & Pijanowski, G.J. (1994). The effect of treatment of fragmented coronoid process on the development of osteoarthritis of the elbow. Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association. 30(2), 190–195.
Kähn, H., Zablotski, Y. & Meyer-Lindenberg, A. (2023). Therapeutic success in fragmented coronoid process disease and other canine medial elbow compartment pathology: a systematic review with meta-analyses. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1228497
Lahiani, J., Dunie-Merigot, A., Caron, A., Boedec, K.L. & Ragetly, G. (2023). Long-term outcomes after arthroscopic treatment of dogs affected by osteochondrosis dissecans of the humeral trochlea, with or without medial coronoid disease: 23 cases (2012-2020). Canadian Veterinary Journal. 87(3), 202–207.
Muller, C., Gaines, B., Gruen, M., Case, B., Arrufat, K., Innes, J. & Lascelles, B.D.X. (2016). Evaluation of Clinical Metrology Instrument in Dogs With Osteoarthritis. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine. 30(3), 836–846. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.13923
Meyer-Lindenberg, A., Langham, A., Fehf, M. & Nolte, I. (2003). Arthrotomy versus arthroscopy in the treatment of the fragmented medial coronoid process of the ulna (FCP) in 421 dogs. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 16(4), 204–210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1632780
Pappa, E., Maddox, T.W, Crystal, E., Comeford, E.J. & Tomlinson, A.W. (2023). Recall Bias in Client-Reported Outcomes in Canine Orthopaedic Patients Using Clinical Metrology Instruments. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 36(6), 302–310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1771032
Perry, K.L. & Li, L. (2014). A retrospective study of short-term complication rate following 750 elective elbow arthroscopies. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 27(1), 68–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3415/VCOT-13-01-0017
Ragetly, G.R., Massey, L. & Brown, D.C. (2019). Initial psychometric testing and validation of the French version of the Canine Brief Pain Inventory. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia. 46(5), 667–672. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaa.2019.04.001
Read, R.A., Armstrong, S.J., O’Keefe, J.D. & Eger, C.E. (1990). Fragmentation of the medial coronoid process of the ulna in dogs: a study of 109 cases. Journal of Small Animal Practice. 31(7), 330–334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5827.1990.tb00823.x
Seidler, S, Siedenburg, J, Rhode, M, Volk. H.A. & Harms, O. (2023). Dogs with Bilateral Medial Coronoid Disease Can Be Clinically Sound after Unilateral Arthroscopic Fragment Removal—Preliminary Study. Animals. 13(24), DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13243803
Theyse, L.F.H., Hazewinkel, H.A.W. & van den Brom, W.E. (2000). Force plate analysis before and after surgical treatment of unilateral fragmented coronoid process. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 13(3), 135—140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1632648
Vezzoni, A. & Benjamino, K. (2021). Canine Elbow Dysplasia: Ununited Anconeal Process, Osteochondritis Dissecans and Medial Coronoid Disease. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice. 51(2), 439–474. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvsm.2020.12.007
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Anant Andy Banerjee
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Veterinary Evidence uses the Creative Commons copyright Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. That means users are free to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially - with the appropriate citation.
