DOI
https://doi.org/10.18849/ve.v9i2.683Abstract
PICO Question
In healthy dogs undergoing a surgical procedure, is there improved pain control in dogs receiving intravenous paracetamol in the peri / postoperative period compared to dogs not receiving intravenous paracetamol?
Clinical bottom line
Category of research
Treatment.
Number and type of study designs reviewed
Three randomised, controlled, and blinded studies. Two studies directly address the PICO question whereby postoperative pain assessment was clinically evaluated following intravenous (IV) paracetamol. The third study addressed the question to a lesser extent, whereby the impact on the sevoflurane minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) reduction in response to noxious stimuli was assessed following the administration of IV paracetamol.
Strength of evidence
Weak.
Outcomes reported
The findings of the first two studies presented appear to directly contradict each other. The first study demonstrated a reduction in pain in all groups and found no differences in analgesia between IV paracetamol and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatories drugs (NSAIDs), while the second study reported no analgesia effects from IV paracetamol and was terminated prematurely because a high number of dogs required rescue analgesia. The first study reported sufficient analgesic effects of IV paracetamol and the second study reported no analgesia effects of IV paracetamol. Both were blinded, randomised, controlled studies and directly addressed the PICO question in relation to the peri / postoperative analgesic effects of IV paracetamol. However, their methods and sample sizes were very different. The third study did not demonstrate a clinically relevant sevoflurane MAC reduction after IV paracetamol in dogs.
Conclusion
At present, there is limited and weak evidence to suggest that IV paracetamol provides peri / postoperative analgesia in dogs. However, further studies are required to better assess its efficacy, its duration of action, and the appropriate doses that are necessary to reach therapeutic plasma levels. The reduced incidence of side effects at the currently recommended doses could support its peri / postoperative use, where NSAIDs use is contraindicated.
How to apply this evidence in practice
The application of evidence into practice should take into account multiple factors, not limited to: individual clinical expertise, patient’s circumstances and owners’ values, country, location or clinic where you work, the individual case in front of you, the availability of therapies and resources.
Knowledge Summaries are a resource to help reinforce or inform decision making. They do not override the responsibility or judgement of the practitioner to do what is best for the animal in their care.
References
Brett, C., Barnett, S.G. & Pearson, J. (2012). Postoperative Plasma Paracetamol Levels following Oral or Intravenous Paracetamol Administration: A Double-Blind Randomised Controlled Trial. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care. 40(1), 166–171. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0310057X1204000121
Bufalari, A., Di Meo, A., Nannarone, S., Padua, S. & Adami, C. (2007). Fentanyl or sufentanil continuous infusion during isoflurane anaesthesia in dogs: Clinical experiences. Veterinary Research Communications. 31(1), 277–280. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11259-007-0046-z
De Moura, R.S., Bittar, I.P., Gomes, J.H., de Oliveira, Y.V.R., de Sousa Filho, G.D., de Faria Soares, G.C.F., Lima, E.M. & Franco, L.G. (2022). Plasma concentration, cardiorespiratory and analgesic effects of ketamine-fentanyl infusion in dogs submitted to mastectomy. BMC Veterinary Research. 18(1), 225–225. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-022-03244-1
Gibb, I.A. & B.J. Anderson. (2008). Paracetamol (acetaminophen) pharmacodynamics: interpreting the plasma concentration. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 93(3), 241–247. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/adc.2007.126896
González-Blanco P., Canfrán, S., Mota, R., Gómez de Segura, I.A. & Aguado, D. (2020). Effects of a single paracetamol injection on the sevoflurane minimum alveolar concentration in dogs. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research. 84(1), 37-43.
Gutierrez-Blanco, E., Victoria-Mora, J.M., Ibancovichi-Camarillo, J.A., Sauri-Arceo, C.H., Bolio-González, M.E., Acevedo-Arcique, C.M., Marin-Cano, G. & Steagall, P.V.M. (2015). Postoperative analgesic effects of either a constant rate infusion of fentanyl, lidocaine, ketamine, dexmedetomidine, or the combination lidocaine-ketamine-dexmedetomidine after ovariohysterectomy in dogs. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia. 42(3), 309–318. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/vaa.12215
Hernández-Avalos, I., Valverde, A., Ibancovichi-Camarillo, J.A., Sánchez-Aparicio, P., Recillas-Morales, S., Osorio-Avalos, J., Rodríguez-Velázquez, D. & Miranda-Cortés, A.E. (2020). Clinical evaluation of postoperative analgesia, cardiorespiratory parameters and changes in liver function tests of paracetamol compared to meloxicam and carprofen in dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy in dogs. PLoS One. 15(2), e0223697. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223697
KuKanich, B., Bidgood, T. & Knesl, O. (2012). Clinical pharmacology of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in dogs. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia.39(1), 69–90. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2995.2011.00675.x
Leung J., Beths, T., Carter, J.E., Munn, R., Whittem, T. & Bauquier, S.H. (2021). Intravenous Acetaminophen Does Not Provide Adequate Postoperative Analgesia in Dogs Following Ovariohysterectomy. Animals (Basel). 11(12), DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11123609
Lascelles, B.D.X., Cripps, J.P. & Waterman, E.A. (1997). Post-operative central hypersensitivity and pain: the pre-emptive value of pethidine for ovariohysterectomy. Pain. 73(3), 461–471. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3959(97)00141-3
Pacheco M., Knowles, T.G., Hunt, J., Slingsby, L.S., Taylor, P.M. & Murrell, J.C. (2020). Comparing paracetamol/codeine and meloxicam for postoperative analgesia in dogs: a non-inferiority trial. Veterinary Record. 187(8), e61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.105487
Reed, R. & Doherty, T. (2018). Minimum alveolar concentration: Key concepts and a review of Its pharmacological reduction in dogs. Part 2. Research in Veterinary Science. 118, 27–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2018.01.009
Reid, J., Nolan, A.M., Hughes, J.M.L., Lascelles, D., Pawson, P. & Scott, E.M. (2007). Development of the Short-Form Glasgow Composite Measure Pain Scale (CMPS-SF) and derivation of an analgesic intervention score. Animal Welfare. 16(1), 97–104. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S096272860003178X
Serrano-Rodríguez, J.M., Mengual, C., Quirós-Carmona, S., Fernândez, J., Domínguez, J.M., Serrano-Caballero, J.M., Morgaz, J., Navarrete-Calvo, R., Gómez-Villamandos, & del Mar Granados, M. (2019). Comparative pharmacokinetics a clinical laboratory evaluation of intravenous acetaminophen in beagle and galgo español dogs. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia. 46(2), 226–235. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaa.2018.09.042
Omer, V.E. & Mohammad, F.K. (1984). Effect of antidotal N-acetylcysteine on the pharmacokinetics of acetaminophen in dogs. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology Therapeutics. 7(4), 277–281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2885.1984.tb00912.x
Waterman, A.E. & Kalthum, W. (1989). Pharmacokinetics of intramuscularly administered pethidine in dogs and the influence of anaesthesia and surgery. Veterinary Record. 124(12), 293–296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.124.12.293
Vettorato, E. & S. Bacco. (2011). A comparison of the sedative and analgesic properties of pethidine (meperidine) and butorphanol in dogs. Journal of Small Animal Practice. 52(8), 426–432. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5827.2011.01085.x
Yamashita, K., Okano, Y., Yamashita, M., Umar, M.A., Kushiro, T. & Muir, W.W. (2008). Effects of Carprofen and Meloxicam with or without Butorphanol on the Minimum Alveolar Concentration of Sevoflurane in Dogs. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science. 70(1), 29–35. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1292/jvms.70.29
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Laura Mckay
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Veterinary Evidence uses the Creative Commons copyright Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. That means users are free to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially - with the appropriate citation.
