DOI
https://doi.org/10.18849/ve.v8i2.663Abstract
The original article was published in Veterinary Evidence Vol 7, Issue 4 (2022): https://doi.org/10.18849/ve.v7i4.608
Unfortunately the original version of the article was missing the following statement.
This Knowledge Summary has reviewed the available evidence on the use of a SGAD (v-gel®) in rabbit anaesthesia. Since writing a new design of a single use supraglottic airway device (SGAD) has been introduced; currently there is no published evidence on whether this new device has an impact on the risk of injury.
This error was in both the HTML and PDF versions. This has now been updated in both the HTML and PDF versions, and can be found in the clinical bottom line and the evidence section.
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Jasmine Gheini, Sanaa Zaki
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Veterinary Evidence uses the Creative Commons copyright Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. That means users are free to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially - with the appropriate citation.
Similar Articles
- Jasmine Gheini, Dr. Sanaa Zaki, Does the use of supraglottic device in rabbits cause less injury than other airway management devices? , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 7 No. 4 (2022): The fourth issue of 2022
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Jasmine Gheini, Dr. Sanaa Zaki, Does the use of supraglottic device in rabbits cause less injury than other airway management devices? , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 7 No. 4 (2022): The fourth issue of 2022
