Erratum to: Does the use of supraglottic device in rabbits cause less injury than other airway management devices?

Jasmine Gheini; Sanaa Zaki

doi:10.18849/ve.v8i2.663

Jasmine Gheini University of Sydney
Sanaa Zaki University of Sydney

Published:

2023-05-05

DOI

https://doi.org/10.18849/ve.v8i2.663

Abstract

The original article was published in Veterinary Evidence Vol 7, Issue 4 (2022): https://doi.org/10.18849/ve.v7i4.608

Unfortunately the original version of the article was missing the following statement.

This Knowledge Summary has reviewed the available evidence on the use of a SGAD (v-gel®) in rabbit anaesthesia. Since writing a new design of a single use supraglottic airway device (SGAD) has been introduced; currently there is no published evidence on whether this new device has an impact on the risk of injury.

This error was in both the HTML and PDF versions. This has now been updated in both the HTML and PDF versions, and can be found in the clinical bottom line and the evidence section.

License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Veterinary Evidence uses the Creative Commons copyright Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. That means users are free to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially - with the appropriate citation.

Keywords