DOI
https://doi.org/10.18849/ve.v7i3.458Abstract
PICO question
Can straw based enrichment be used successfully as a treatment intervention to reduce tail biting injuries in weaner to finisher pigs housed in indoor farming systems?
Clinical bottom line
Category of research question
Treatment
The number and type of study designs reviewed
Three papers were critically reviewed. All three papers answered the PICO question and matched the inclusion criteria for this Knowledge Summary, providing moderate evidence. One non-randomised controlled trial and two randomised controlled trials.
Strength of evidence
Moderate
Outcomes reported
Veit et al. (2016) found that straw based enrichment can reduce tail biting, similarly, Larson et al. (2018) found straw based enrichment could reduce tail biting, however, other factors contribute more so to reducing tail biting. Haigh et al. (2019) did not find evidence to suggest straw-based enrichment could reduce tail biting. Triggers for tail biting injuries are multifaceted, therefore enrichment alone will not eliminate pen mate manipulation
Conclusion
In view of the strength of evidence and the outcomes from the studies the following conclusions have been made; it is expected that these findings provide enough evidence to encourage farmers to introduce novel straw based enrichment as a treatment measure, however it would be most effective if other husbandry factors could be considered in addition
How to apply this evidence in practice
The application of evidence into practice should take into account multiple factors, not limited to: individual clinical expertise, patient’s circumstances and owners’ values, country, location or clinic where you work, the individual case in front of you, the availability of therapies and resources.
Knowledge Summaries are a resource to help reinforce or inform decision making. They do not override the responsibility or judgement of the practitioner to do what is best for the animal in their care.
References
Abriel, M. & Jais, C. (2013). Influence of housing conditions on the appearance of cannibalism in weaning piglets. Landtechnik. 6/2013.
Haigh, A., Yun-Chou, J. & O'Driscoll, K. (2019). An investigation into the effectiveness of compressed straw blocks in reducing abnormal behaviour in growing pigs. Animal. 13(11), 2576–2585. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s1751731119000715
Hunter, E., Jones, T., Guise, H., Penny, R. & Hoste, S. (1999). Tail biting in pigs 1: the prevalence at six UK abattoirs and the relationship of tail biting with docking, sex and other carcass damage. Pig Journal (United Kingdom). 43, 18–32.
Larsen, M.L.V., Andersen, H.M.-L & Pedersen, L.J. (2018). Which is the most preventive measure against tail damage in finisher pigs: tail docking, straw provision or lowered stocking density? Animal. 12(6), 1260–1267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S175173111700249X
Veit, C., Traulsen, I., Hasler, M., Tölle, K., Burfeind, O., Beilage, E. & Krieter, J. (2016). Influence of raw material on the occurrence of tail-biting in undocked pigs. Livestock Science. 191, 125–131. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2016.07.009
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Abigail Liston
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Veterinary Evidence uses the Creative Commons copyright Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. That means users are free to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially - with the appropriate citation.
