For horses undergoing general anaesthesia, are rope recoveries or free recoveries better?

Published:

2021-09-30

Share
Open Access Logo

DOI

https://doi.org/10.18849/ve.v6i3.451

Abstract

PICO question

In horses undergoing general anaesthesia, does assistance with ropes result in better recoveries when compared to no assistance (‘free’ recovery)?

 

Clinical bottom line

Category of research question

Treatment

The number and type of study designs reviewed

One randomised, non-blinded controlled trial and two retrospective cohort studies

Strength of evidence

Weak

Outcomes reported

The three studies reviewed arrive at different conclusions regarding the utility of rope assistance in recovery from general anaesthesia in horses, but examine very different populations. The randomised controlled trial provides weak evidence that rope assistance can shorten recovery and improve recovery quality in healthy (American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I–II) horses. One retrospective cohort study provides weak evidence that rope assistance confers a reduction in fatality in both healthy and sick horses. The other retrospective cohort study provides weak evidence that rope assistance confers no benefit to horses undergoing emergency colic surgery. Both assisted and unassisted groups in each study had fatalities and all studies reported complications related to the rope recovery system

Conclusion

Insufficient evidence is available to permit a full recommendation regarding rope assistance during recovery from general anaesthesia in horses. Rope assistance may improve recovery time and quality in some horses. The decision to perform a rope-assisted recovery must be made considering individual patient, team and clinic factors. Rope assistance cannot prevent fatalities in recovery

 

How to apply this evidence in practice

The application of evidence into practice should take into account multiple factors, not limited to: individual clinical expertise, patient’s circumstances and owners’ values, country, location or clinic where you work, the individual case in front of you, the availability of therapies and resources.

Knowledge Summaries are a resource to help reinforce or inform decision making. They do not override the responsibility or judgement of the practitioner to do what is best for the animal in their care.

 

Open Access Peer Reviewed

References

Arndt, S., Hopster, K., Sill, V., Rohn, K. & Kästner, S.B.R. (2019). Comparison between head-tail-rope assisted and unassisted recoveries in healthy horses undergoing general anesthesia for elective surgeries. Veterinary Surgery. 49(2), 329–338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.13347

Auer, U & Huber, C. (2013). A comparision of head/tail rope-assisted versus unassisted recoveries of horses after patrial intravenous general anaesthesia. Abstracts presented at the Association of Veterinary Anaesthetists Spring meeting, 22nd–23rd March 2012, Davos, Switzerland. (2013). Veterinary Anaesthesia Analgesia. 40(1), 1–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/vaa.12001

Bidwell, L.A., Bramlage, L.R. & Rood, W.A. (2007). Equine perioperative fatalities associated with general anaesthesia at a private practice - a retrospective case series. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia. 34(1), 23–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2995.2005.00283.x

Carter, E. & Anderson, F. (2017). Assessment of agreement among diplomates of the American College of Veterinary Anesthesia for scoring the recovery of horses from anesthesia by use of subjective grading scales and development of a system for evaluation of the recovery of horses from anesthesia by use of accelerometry. American Journal of Veterinary Research. 78(6), 668–676. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.78.6.668

da Silva, D.R.P., Silva, G.B., de la Côrte, F.D., Brass, K.E., Pozzobon, R., Dau, S.L., de Gasperi, D, & Freitas, G.C. (2018). Anesthetic recovery assisted by rope at three points in horses. Ciéncia Rural. 48(11), 1–6. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20180154

de Miguel Garcia, C., Campoy, L., Parry, S., Miller, J.E., Martin-Flores, M. & Gleed, R.D. (2021). Questionnaire on the process of recovering horses from general anesthesia and associated personnel injury in equine practice. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia. 48(2), 223–229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaa.2020.12.005

Dugdale, A.H., Obhrai, J. & Cripps, P.J. (2016). Twenty years later: a single-centre, repeat retrospective analysis of equine perioperative mortality and investigation of recovery quality. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia. 43(2), 171–178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/vaa.12285

Dugdale, A.H.A. & Taylor, P.M. (2016). Equine anaesthesia-associated mortality: where are we now? Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia. 43(3), 242–255. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/vaa.12372

Gozalo-Marcilla, M., Redondo, J.I., Johnston, M., Taylor, P. & Bettschart-Wolfensberger, R. (2020). A new equine anaesthetic mortality study two decades after CEPEF2: CEPEF4 is going live! Equine Veterinary Journal. 52(6), 891–892. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/evj.13327

Johnston, G.M., Eastment, J.K., Wood, J.L.N. & Taylor, P.M. (2002). The confidential enquiry into perioperative equine fatalities (CEPEF): mortality results of Phases 1 and 2. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia.29(4), 159–170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-2995.2002.00106.x

Johnston, G.M., Taylor, P.M., Holmes, M.A. & Wood, J.L.N. (1995). Confidential enquiry of perioperative equine fatalities (CEPEF‐1): preliminary results. Equine Veterinary Journal. 27(3), 193–200. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.1995.tb03062.x

Laurenza, C., Ansart, L. & Portier, K. (2020). Risk factors of anesthesia-related mortality and morbidity in one equine hospital: a retrospective study on 1,161 cases undergoing elective or emergency surgeries. Frontiers Veterinary Science. 6, 1–10. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00514

Nicolaisen, A.S.K., Bendix Nygaard, A., Christophersen, M.T., Jensen, D.B. & Lindegaard, C. (2020). Effect of head and tail rope-assisted recovery of horses after elective and emergency surgery under general anaesthesia. Equine Veterinary Education. 1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/eve.13397

Niimura Del Barrio, M.C., David, F., Hughes, J.M.L., Clifford, D., Wilderjans, H. & Bennett, R. (2018). A retrospective report (2003–2013) of the complications associated with the use of a one-man (head and tail) rope recovery system in horses following general anaesthesia. Irish Veterinary Journal. 71(1), 1–9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13620-018-0117-1

Rüegg, M., Bettschart-Wolfensberger, R., Hartnack, S., Junge, H.K., Theiss, F. & Ringer, S.K. (2016). Comparison of non-assisted versus head and tail rope-assisted recovery after emergency abdominal surgery in horses. Pferdeheilkunde. 32(5):469–478. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21836/PEM20160508

Young, S.S. & Taylor, P.M. (1993). Factors influencing the outcome of equine anaesthesia: a review of 1,314 cases. Equine Veterinary Journal. 25(2), 147–151. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.1993.tb02926.x

1,122

Save

1,058

View

Vol. 6 No. 3 (2021): The third issue of 2021

Section: Knowledge Summaries

Categories :  Small Animal  /  Dogs  /  Cats  /  Rabbits  /  Production Animal  /  Cattle  /  Sheep  /  Pig  /  Equine  /  Exotics  /