Clinical governance and continuous Quality Improvement in the veterinary profession: A mixed-method study



Open Access Logo



96% of the veterinary profession agrees that Quality Improvement (QI) improves veterinary care. While clinical governance is an RCVS professional requirement, over the last year only 60% spent up to 3 days on the Quality Improvement activities which allow clinical governance to take place. 11% spent no time on it at all. A lack of time, know-how and organisational support were among the barriers preventing its adoption in practice.

Rather than being an individual reaction to a problem, Quality Improvement is a formal approach to embedding a set of recognised practices, including clinical audit, significant event audit, guidelines and protocols, benchmarking and checklists. This framework should be applied within a just culture where errors are redefined as learning opportunities, and precedence is given to communication, team-work and team-morale, patient safety, and distributed leadership.

Addressing this gap will require evolution – rather than a revolution. Persistent packages, given enough time and addressing the whole flow of the patient journey, trump one-off ‘heroic’ and narrowly-focused interventions. Creating a rhythm of learning alongside stability of practice allows lessons to be absorbed and improvements routinised. Doing good things well is better than doing perfect things sporadically and helps address the widespread concern that there is insufficient time for QI by making the time commitment more predictable and manageable.

The research provides a robust, evidence-based, roadmap for the entire sector including professional organisations, educators, those in management positions and care providers.


Open Access Peer Reviewed


Practice facilitation handbook. Module 4: Approaches to quality improvement. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. [online] Available from: [Accessed 1/2/2021]

Ballantyne, H.(2016).Beyond the nursing care plan: an introduction to care bundles.Veterinary Nursing Journal. 31(2), 43– DOI:

Batalden, P. B. & Davidoff, F. (2007). What is “quality improvement” and how can it transform healthcare? BMJ Quality & Safety. 16(1), 2–3. DOI:

CVS Group publishes quality improvement and clinical governance report. CVS Group Plc. [online] Available from: [Accessed 1/2/2021]

Dixon-Woods, M., McNicol, S. & Martin, G. (2012). Ten challenges in improving quality in healthcare: lessons from the Health Foundation's programme evaluations and relevant literature. BMJ Quality & Safety. 21(10), 876– DOI:

Godin, G., Bélanger-Gravel, A., Eccles, M. & Grimshaw, J. (2008). Healthcare professionals' intentions and behaviours: A systematic review of studies based on social cognitive theories. Implementation Science. 3(36). DOI:

Ham, C., Berwick, D, & Dixon, J. (2016). Improving quality in the English NHS: A strategy for action. The King’s Fund. [online] Available from: [Accessed 04 May 2021]

Hocking, L., Ling, T., Doorly, A. & Gush, C. (2020a). Continuous quality improvement: a roadmap for the veterinary professions. RCVS Knowledge. [online] Available from: [Accessed 1/2/2021]

Hocking, L., Newbould, J., Parkinson, S., Stewart, K., Harshfield, A. & Ling, T. (2020b). Strengthening the contribution of improvers to UK health and care? An evaluation of the Q Initiative 2016–2020. RAND. DOI:

Hocking, L., Picken, N. & Ling, T. (2020c). Assessing the landscape and future actions for quality improvement in the veterinary sector. RCVS Knowledge. Available from: [Accessed 1/2/2021]

Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st Century. National Academy Press. Available from: [Accessed 1/2/2021]

Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Kohn, L., Corrigan, J. & Donaldson, M. (eds) (2000) To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. National Academies Press. Available from: [Accessed 1/2/2021]

T., Stewart, K., Garrod, B., Hocking, L., Newbould J. & Gendronneau, C. (2018). Evaluation of the second phase of the Q Initiative 2016–2020: Interim report. RAND. DOI:

Øvretveit, J. Perspectives on context: How does context affect quality improvement? The Health Foundation. [online] Available from: [Accessed 04 May 2021]

Oxtoby, C. & Mossop, L. (2016). Checklists and clinical governance: learning from the NHS. In Practice. 38(8), 408–410. DOI:

Our commitment to QI (2017). RCVS Knowledge. [online] Available from: [Accessed 1/2/2021]

Quality improvement. RCVS Knowledge. [online] Available from: [Accessed 1/2/2021]

The Q Improvement Lab. The Health Foundation. [online] Available from: [Accessed 1/2/2021]

The Scottish Improvement Journey: a nationwide approach to improvement. (2018). The Scottish Government. [online] Available from: [Accessed 03/02/2021]

What are ‘quality’ and ‘quality improvement’? The Health Foundation. [online] Available from: [Accessed 1/2/2021]

VeNom: Veterinary nomenclature. VeNom Coding. [online] Available from: [Accessed 1/2/2021]

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.