DOI
https://doi.org/10.18849/ve.v6i3.372Abstract
PICO question
In reducing surgical recovery time in rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus), should doses exceeding 0.2 mg/kg of oral meloxicam be given and is twice daily administration more effective than a single daily dose?
Clinical bottom line
Category of research question
Treatment
The number and type of study designs reviewed
Nine papers were critically reviewed, yet no studies were found to directly investigate the effects of twice daily dosing with meloxicam postoperatively in rabbits. There were five descriptive, non-comparative case series; two nonblinded parallel group randomised control trials; one blinded, placebo-controlled parallel group randomised trial and one prospective, randomised crossover trial
Strength of evidence
Weak
Outcomes reported
The current recommended oral dose of meloxicam in rabbits of 0.2–0.3 mg/kg once a day was consistently described as inadequate for postoperative analgesia following surgery (Delk et al., 2014). Instead, higher doses of 1–1.5 mg/kg were required to reach a similar peak plasma concentration as found to be clinically effective in other species, such as canines, and provide a better degree of analgesia in rabbits (Montoya et al., 2004; and Delk et al., 2014). Although no studies were found evaluating twice daily administration of meloxicam, the available evidence suggests a dose exceeding 0.2–0.3 mg/kg daily is required for adequate postoperative analgesia in rabbits. Whether this increased dose could be given twice daily should be investigated, providing scope for future research
Conclusion
Further studies are required to directly assess the benefits of twice daily oral meloxicam. However, it is possible that a dose exceeding 0.2–0.3 mg/kg is required and therefore higher doses should be considered in these studies
How to apply this evidence in practice
The application of evidence into practice should take into account multiple factors, not limited to: individual clinical expertise, patient’s circumstances and owners’ values, country, location or clinic where you work, the individual case in front of you, the availability of therapies and resources.
Knowledge Summaries are a resource to help reinforce or inform decision making. They do not override the responsibility or judgement of the practitioner to do what is best for the animal in their care.
References
Boehringer Ingelheim. (2014). Metacam - Package Insert for Dogs, Boehringer Ingelheim. [online] Available at: https://www.bi-vetmedica.com/sites/default/files/dam/internet/ah/vetmedica/com_EN/product_files/metacam/BIVM-15129-Metacam-Injectable-DOG-PI-v1.pdf [Accessed: 13 November 2020].
Carpenter, J. W., Pollock, C. G., Koch, D. E. and Hunter, R. P. (2009). Single and Multiple-Dose Pharmacokinetics of Meloxicam after Oral Administration to the Rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine. 40(4), 601–606. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1638/2007-0115.1
Cooper, C. S., Metcalf-Pate, K. A., Barat, C. E., Cook, J. A. and Scorpio, D. G. (2009). Comparison of side effects between buprenorphine and meloxicam used postoperatively in Dutch belted rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science. [online] 48(3), 279–285. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2696831/ [Accessed: 5 May 2020].
Delk, K. W., Carpenter, J. W,, KuKanich, B., Nietfeld, J. C. and Kohles, M. (2014). Pharmacokinetics of meloxicam administered orally to rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) for 29 days. American Journal of Veterinary Research. 75(2), 195–199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.75.2.195
Eshar, D. & Weese, J. S. (2014). Molecular analysis of the microbiota in hard feces from healthy rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) medicated with long term oral meloxicam. BMC Veterinary Research. 10, 62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-10-62
Fredholm, D. V., Carpenter, J. W., KuKanich, B. and Kohles, M. (2013). Pharmacokinetics of meloxicam in rabbits after oral administration of single and multiple doses. American Journal of Veterinary Research. 74(4), pp. 636–641. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.74.4.636
Goldschlager, G. B., Gillespie, V. L., Palme, R. and Baxter, M. G. (2013). Effects of multimodal analgesia with low- Dose buprenorphine and meloxicam on fecal glucocorticoid metabolites after surgery in New Zealand white rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science. 52(5), 571–576.
Keating S. C. J., Thomas, A. A., Flecknell, P. A. and Leach, M. C. (2012). Evaluation of EMLA Cream for Preventing Pain during Tattooing of Rabbits: Changes in Physiological, Behavioural and Facial Expression Responses. PLOS ONE. 7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044437
Leach, M. C., Allweiler, S., Richardson, C., Roughan, J. V., Narbe, R. and Flecknell, P. A. (2009). Behavioural effects of ovariohysterectomy and oral administration of meloxicam in laboratory housed rabbits. Research in Veterinary Science. 87(2), 336–347. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2009.02.001
Legislation.gov.uk (2006). Animal Welfare Act 2006. Statute Law Database. [online] Available at: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/45/contents [Accessed: 8 November 2020].
Mähler Convenor, M., Berard, M., Feinstein, R., Gallagher, A., Illgen-Wilcke, B., Pritchett-Corning, K. and Raspa, M. (2014). FELASA recommendations for the health monitoring of mouse, rat, hamster, guinea pig and rabbit colonies in breeding and experimental units. Laboratory Animals. 48(3), 178–192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0023677213516312
Montoya, L., Ambros, L., Kreil, V., Bonafine, R., Albarellos, G., Hallu, R. and Soraci, A. (2004). A Pharmacokinetic Comparison of Meloxicam and Ketoprofen following Oral Administration to Healthy Dogs. Veterinary Research Communications. 28(5), 415–428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:VERC.0000034995.81994.49
Raillard, M., Detotto, C., Grepper, S., Beslac, O., Fujioka-Kobayashi, M., Schaller, B. and Saulacic, N. (2019). Anaesthetic and Perioperative Management of 14 Male New Zealand White Rabbits for Calvarial Bone Surgery. Animals. 9(11), 896. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9110896
Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M, Hollister EB, Lesniewski RA, Oakley BB, Parks DH, Robinson CJ, Sahl JW, Stres B, Thalinger GG, Van Horn DJ, Weber CF. (2009) Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 75(23), 7537–7541. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01541-09
Turner, P. V., Chen, C. H. and Taylor, M. W. (2006). Pharmacokinetics of meloxicam in rabbits after single and repeat oral dosing. Comparative Medicine. [online] 56(1), 63–67. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16521861/ [Accessed: 6 May 2020].
Wagner, J. G. (1967). Drug Accumulation. The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and The Journal of New Drugs. 7(2), 84–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1552-4604.1967.tb00290.x
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Eleanor Best
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Veterinary Evidence uses the Creative Commons copyright Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. That means users are free to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially - with the appropriate citation.
