In healthy dogs undergoing open wound management, does the topical application of honey, when compared to wounds treated with daily saline washes only, reduce the time to complete wound healing?
Editorial notice: Upon conducting the literature search for this Knowledge Summary the author discovered that the same paper had been published in two separate journals and that a third paper by the same author appeared to have used data from the same experimental subjects as the duplicate publication, despite reporting different methodology. The duplicate publications have been appraised by the author as one paper. The editorial office alerted the journals in question which resulted in the article that appeared in the Iranian Journal of Veterinary Surgery (Jalali, F.S. S., Tajik, H., Saifzaideh, S and Fartash, B. (2007b) Topical Application of Natural Urmia Honey on Experimental Burn Wounds in the Dog: Clinical and Microbiological Studies. Iranian Journal of Veterinary Surgery. 2(2), 13–21) being retracted: http://www.ivsajournals.com/article_114759.html. See our own policy on duplicate publication for more information.
Clinical bottom line
Category of research question
The number and type of study designs reviewed
Two studies satisfied the inclusion criteria for answering the PICO; both were prospective randomised controlled trials
Strength of evidence
The studies demonstrated a possible effect size of clinical importance of the use of honey in the treatment of canine wounds in terms of time to complete wound healing and antibacterial effect. However, the strength of the evidence provided by both studies is severely weakened by flaws in trial design, implementation and reporting, and the possible risk of pseudo replication between the two trials reported
The use of topical honey in canine open wound management may reduce time to complete wound healing. However, the evidence for this is weak. At present, the evidence that use of topical honey in canine wounds reduces time to healing is insufficient to warrant a change in clinical practice
The application of evidence into practice should take into account multiple factors, not limited to: individual clinical expertise, patient’s circumstances and owners’ values, country, location or clinic where you work, the individual case in front of you, the availability of therapies and resources.
Knowledge Summaries are a resource to help reinforce or inform decision making. They do not override the responsibility or judgement of the practitioner to do what is best for the animal in their care.
Alvarez-Suarez, J. M., Gasparrini, M., Forbes-Hernández, T. Y., Mazzoni, M. and Giampieri, F. (2014). The Composition and Biological Activity of Honey: A Focus on Manuka Honey. Foods, 3(3): 420–432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/foods3030420
Brans, T. A., Dutrieux R. P., Hoekstra, M. J., Kreis, R. W. and Du Pont, J. S. (1994). Histopathological Evaluation of Scalds and Contact Burns in the Pig Model. Burns 20(1): S48–S51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-4179(94)90090-6
Bischofberger, A. S., Dart, C. M., Perkins, M. R., Kelly, A., Jeffcott, l. and Dart, A. J. (2013). The Effect of Short- and Long-Term Treatment with Manuka Honey on Second Intention Healing of Contaminated Wounds and Noncontaminated Wounds on the Distal Aspect of the Forelimb in Horses. Veterinary Surgery, 42(2): 154–160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950x.2012.01083.x
Gottrup, F., Apelquist, J. and Price, P. (2010). Outcomes in Controlled and Comparative Studies on Non-Healing Wounds: Recommendations to Improve the Quality of Evidence in Wound Management. Journal of Wound Care, 19(6): 239–268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2010.19.6.48471
Halstead, F. D., Lee, K. C., Kwei, J., Dretzke, J., Oppenheim, J. and Moiemen, N. S. (2018). A Systematic Review of Quantitative Burn Wound Microbiology in the Management of Burns Patients. Burns, 44(1): 39– DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2017.06.008
Haryanto, H., Urai, T., Mukai, K., Suriadi, S., Sugama, J. and Nakatani, T. (2012). Effectiveness of Indonesian Honey on the Acceleration of Cutaneous Wound Healing: An Experimental Study in Mice. Wounds, 24(4): 110–119.
Jalali, F. S. S., Tajik, H., Saifzaideh, S. and Fartash, B. (2007a). Topical Application of Natural Urmia Honey on Experimental Burn Wounds in the Dog: Clinical and Microbiological Studies. Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 2(3): 133–139. DOI: https://doi.org/ 3923/ajava.2007.133.139
Jalali, F. S. S., Tajik, H., Saifzaideh, S. and Fartash, B. (2007b). Topical Application of Natural Urmia Honey on Experimental Burn Wounds in the Dog: Clinical and Microbiological Studies. Iranian Journal of Veterinary Surgery, 2(2): 13–21.
Jalali, F. S. S., Saifzaideh, S., Tajik, H. and Farshad, A. A. (2007c). Experimental Evaluation of Repair Process of Burn-Wounds Treated with Natural Honey. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 6(2): 179–184.
Jull, A. B., Cullum, N., Dumville, J. C., Westby, M. J., Deshpande, S. and Walker, N. (2015). Honey as a Topical Treatment for Wounds. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3 Article Number CD005083. DOI: https://doi.org//10.1002/14651858.CD005083.pub4
Lawrence, J. C. (1994). Burn Bacteriology during the last 50 years. Burns 18: 23–29.
Molnar, J. A., Lew, W. K., Rapp, D. A., Gordon, E. S., Voignier, D., Rushing, S. and Willner, W. (2009). Use of Standardised, Quantitative Digital Photography in a Multicenter Web-based Study. EplastyI, 9(e4).
Nakajima, Y., Nakano, Y., Fuwano, S., Hayashi, N., Hiratoko, Y., Kinoshita, A., Miyahara, M., Mochizuki, T., Nishino, K., Tsuruhara, Y., Yokokawa, Y., Iuchi, T., Kon, Y., Mukai, K., Kitayama, Y., Murakado, M., Okuwa, M. and Nakatani, T. (2013). Effects of Three Types of Japanese Honey on Full-Thickness Wound in Mice. Evidence Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Volume 2013: 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/504537
Schultz, G., Mozingo, D., Romanelli, M. and Klaxton, K. (2005). Wound Healing and TIME; New Concepts and Scientific Applications. Wound Repair and Regeneration, 13(4): S1–S11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1067-1927.2005.1304S1.x
Van Hengel, T., Ter Haar, G. and Kirpensteijn, J. (2013). Chapter 2: Wound management: a new protocol for dogs and cats in Reconstructive Surgery and Wound Management in the Dog and Cat Eds Kirpensteijn, J and Ter Haar, G. London: Manson Publishing Ltd, 21–48.
Copyright (c) 2020 Louisa Marcombes
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Veterinary Evidence uses the Creative Commons copyright Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. That means users are free to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially - with the appropriate citation.