In dogs with metaldehyde intoxication, are benzodiazepines (e.g. diazepam, midazolam) more effective than methocarbamol in relaxing muscles and reducing tremors?
Clinical bottom line
Category of research question
The number and type of study designs reviewed
Five papers were critically reviewed. There were five retrospective case series
Strength of evidence
Currently, five retrospective case series exist in the literature which discuss metaldehyde intoxication cases treated mainly with benzodiazepines, a few of which had methocarbamol. There is not really any study to compare directly benzodiazepines with methocarbamol. In addition to that, factors such as commercial (e.g. the low availability of methocarbamol in the UK market compared to the US market), administrational (e.g. multiple administration routes of benzodiazepines) and pharmacological (e.g. lack of anticonvulsant function of methocarbamol), have played an important role in the treatment choice. Several case reports exist as well
Currently, there is insufficient evidence to determine whether benzodiazepines are more effective than methocarbamol in relaxing muscles and reducing occurrence of muscle tremors
The application of evidence into practice should take into account multiple factors, not limited to: individual clinical expertise, patient’s circumstances and owners’ values, country, location or clinic where you work, the individual case in front of you, the availability of therapies and resources.
Knowledge Summaries are a resource to help reinforce or inform decision-making. They do not override the responsibility or judgement of the practitioner to do what is best for the animal in their care.
Bates, N.S., Sutton, N.M. & Campbell, A. (2012). Suspected metaldehyde slug bait poisoning in dogs: a retrospective analysis of cases reported to the Veterinary Poisons Information Service. Veterinary Record, 171(13): 324. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.100734
Charalambous, M., Bhatti, S.F.M., Van Ham, L., Platt, S., Jeffery, N.D., Tipold, A., Siedenburgh, J., Volk, H.A., Hasegawa, D., Gallucci, A., Gandini, G., Musteata, M., Ives, E. & Vanhaesebrouck, A.E. (2017). Intranasal Midazolam versus Rectal Diazepam for the Management of Canine Status Epilepticus: A Multicenter Randomized Parallel‐Group Clinical Trial. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, 31(4): 1149–1158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.14734
Charalambous, M., Volk, H.A., Tipold, A., Erath, J., Huenerfauth, E., Gallucci, A., Gandini, G., Hasegawa, D., Pancotto, T., Rossmeisl, J.H., Platt, S., De Risio, L., Coates, J.R., Musteata, M., Tirrito, F., Cozzi, F., Porcarelli, L., Corlazzoli, D., Cappello, R., Vanhaesebrouck, A., Broeckx, B.J.G., Van Ham, L. & Bhatti, S.F.M. (2019). Comparison of intranasal versus intravenous midazolam for management of status epilepticus in dogs: A multi‐center randomized parallel group clinical study. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, 33(6): 2709–2717. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.15627
Cloyd, J.C., Vezeau, C. & Miller, K.W. (1980). Availability of diazepam from plastic containers. American Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, 37(4): 492–496. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/37.4.492
Dolder, L.K. (2003). Metaldehyde toxicosis. Veterinary Medicine, March: 213–215.
Draper, W.E., Bolfer, L., Cottam, E., McMichael, M. & Schubert, T. (2013). Methocarbamol CRI for Symptomatic Treatment of Pyrethroid Intoxication: A Report of Three Cases. Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association, 49(5): 325–328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5326/JAAHA-MS-5835
Firth, A. (1992). Part 2: Treatment of snail bait toxicity in dogs: retrospective study of 56 cases. Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care,2(1): 31–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-4431.1992.tb00021.x
Frey, H.H., Philippin, H.P. & Scheuler, W. (1984). Development of tolerance to the anticonvulsant effect of diazepam in dogs. European Journal of Pharmacology, 104(1–2): 27–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2999(84)90365-0
Jull, P., Horton, C., Volk, H.A. & De Risio, L. (2011). Effect of prolonged status epilepticus as a result of intoxication on epileptogenesis in a UK canine population. Veterinary Record, 169(14): 361. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.d4750
Lowrie, M. & Garosi, L. (2016). Classification of involuntary movements in dgs: Tremors and twitches. The Veterinary Journal, 214: 109–116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2016.05.011
Musulin, S.E., Mariani, C.L. & Papich, M.G. (2011). Diazepam pharmacokinetics after nasal drop and atomized nasal administration in dogs. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 34(1): 17–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2885.2010.01186.x
Nielsen, C. & Pluhar, G.E. (2005). Diagnosis and treatment of hind limb muscle strain injuries in 22 dogs. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 18(4): 247–253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1632962
Papich, M.G. & Alcorn, J. (1996). Absorption of diazepam after its rectal administration in dogs. American Journal of Veterinary Research, 56: 1629–1636.
Plumb, D.C. (2008). Plumb’s Veterinary Drug Handbook. 6th ed. Iowa: Blackwell Publishing.
Podell, M. (1995). The Use of Diazepam Per Rectum at Home for the Acute Management of Cluster Seizures in Dogs. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, 9(2): 68–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-1676.1995.tb03275.x
Van Tulder, M.W., Touray, T., Furlan, A.D., Solway, S., Bouter, L.M. (2003). Muscle relaxants for non-specific low-back pain. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews,DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004252
Yas-Natan, E., Segev, G. & Aroch, I. (2007). Clinical, neurological and clinicopathological signs, treatment and outcome of metaldehyde intoxication in 18 dogs. Journal of Small Animal Practice, 48(8): 438–443. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5827.2007.00360.x
Zimmermann, R., Steinberg, T.A., Raith, K., Hulsmeyer, V. & Fischer, A. (2010). Canine status epilepticus due to acute intoxication. Tierärztliche Praxis, 38(5): 285–294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1622862
Copyright (c) 2020 T Liatis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Veterinary Evidence uses the Creative Commons copyright Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. That means users are free to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially - with the appropriate citation.