Is there enough evidence to recommend surgical treatment as opposed to conservative treatment for dogs affected by bicipital tenosynovitis?

Alexandra Penelas

doi:10.18849/ve.v1i2.29

Alexandra Penelas University of Zurich, Vetsuisse Faculty, Rämistrasse 71, 8006 Zürich, Switzerland

Published:

2016-05-20

DOI

https://doi.org/10.18849/ve.v1i2.29

Abstract

Clinical bottom line

There is currently insufficient evidence to conclude that tenotomy or tenodesis has a better outcome compared to conservative treatment in cases of canine bicipital tenosynovitis.

References

Bruce, W. J. et al (2000) Bicipital tendinitis and tenosynovitis in the dog: a study of 15 cases. New Zealand Veterinary Journal, 48 (02), pp. 44-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00480169.2000.36157

Stobie, D. et al (1995) Chronic bicipital tenosynovitis in dogs: 29 cases (1985-1992). Journal of American Veterinary Medical Association, 207, pp. 201-7.

Wall, C. R. and Taylor, R. (2002) Arthroscopic biceps brachii tenotomy as a treatment for canine bicipital tenosynovitis. Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association, 38 (2), pp. 169-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.5326/0380169

License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Veterinary Evidence uses the Creative Commons copyright Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. That means users are free to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially - with the appropriate citation.