How and why you should segment veterinary markets

  • Joseph Hill Author

Published:

2020-04-28

Share
Open Access Logo

DOI

https://doi.org/10.18849/ve.v5i2.289

Abstract

Veterinary markets are traditionally split into three main species related categories. For a business to compete effectively, a greater understanding of the relevant markets and client expectations are required. Segmenting markets into defined sections allows a business to gain a comprehensive insight into where it currently operates and where it needs to position itself in the future.

 

Open Access Peer Reviewed

References

Boden, E. (2005). Blacks Veterinary Dictionary. A & C Black Publishers Ltd.

Brown, J.P. & Silverman, J.D. (1999). The current and future market for veterinarians and veterinary medical services in the United States. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 215(2), 161–183.

Clemens, E.S. & Cook, J.M. (1999). Politics and institutionalism: Explaining durability and change. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 441–466. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.25.1.441

DiMaggio, P.J. & Powell, W.W. (1983). The iron cage revisited-Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Association, 48(2), 147–160. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2095101

Eisenhardt, K.M. (1988). Agency-and institutional-theory explanations: The case of retail sales compensation. Academy of Management Journal, 31(3), 488–511. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/256457

Gabay, G., Moskowitz, H.R., Rotondo, K.J. & Aspros, D.G. (2014). Understanding the mind of pet owners for veterinary services. Services Marketing Quarterly, 35(1), 1–18. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15332969.2014.856729

Greenwood, R. & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: The big five accounting firms. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 27–48. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.20785498

Gripper, J. (1998). Incorporation and its implications for veterinary practice. In Practice, 20(3), 154–156. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/inpract.20.3.154

Hill, J. & Moffett, J. (2017). Psychological contracts: the unwritten promises of veterinary employment. In Practice, 39(1), 42–44. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/inp.j78

Hill, A. & Hill, T. (2018). Manufacturing Operations Strategy. Palgrave Macmillan.

Lee, D.E. (2006). Marketing Veterinary Services. Veterinary Clinic Small Animal, 36(2), 281–295. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cvsm.2005.11.003

Lue, T.W., Pantenburg, D.P. & Crawford, P.M. (2008). Impact of the owner-pet and client-veterinarian bond on the care that pets receive. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 232(4), 531–540. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2460/javma.232.4.531

McDonald, M., Christopher, M. & Bass, M. (2003). Market segmentation. In: Marketing. Palgrave, London

Meyer, A.D. (1982). Adapting to environmental jolts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27(4), 515–537. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2392528

Meyer, J.W. & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/226550

Moser, R.H. & Johns, H.E. (2012). An empirical analysis of the public’s attitude toward advertising veterinarian services: A comparative cross-sectional study. Services Marketing Quarterly, 33(4), 363–380. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15332969.2012.715056

The National Archives. (2012). Competition Commission – Veterinary Medicines.

NOAH (2019). Legal Category.

Polzin, D.J. (2011). Chronic kidney disease in small animals. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice, 41(1), 15–30. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cvsm.2010.09.004

RCVS (2000) Guide to Professional Conduct, Part 2 · E.

Walker, O., Mullins, J.W., Harper, B.H. & Larreche, J. (2011). Marketing strategy—a decision focused approach. New York: McGraw-Hill International Edition.

Zucker, L.G. (1987). Institutional theories of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 443–464. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.13.080187.002303

2,023

Save

1,628

View