scalpel

Outcome of Electrosurgery Versus Scalpel Blade for Intestinal Incisions in Dogs

Emmanouil Tzimtzimis

Published:  14/08/2019    in:  Knowledge Summaries
Views
70
Full Text:
13
PDF:
5



scalpel
Abstract
PICO question

In dogs that undergo intestinal surgery, does the use of monopolar electrosurgery for intestinal incisions increase the risk of dehiscence when compared to a scalpel blade?

Clinical bottom line

Currently there are two experimental in vivo studies comparing electrosurgery with scalpel blade intestinal incisions in dogs, one in cats and one in pigs. In dogs and cats, there is data regarding incisions on the large intestine but not the small intestine.

Colotomy and colectomy performed with monopolar electrosurgery has resulted in significant mortality (up to 60%) during the short-term postoperative period in dogs. Although the studies reviewed have several limitations, the outcome using scalpel blades was significantly better, therefore colonic surgery using electrosurgery is contraindicated. It is likely that small intestinal surgery has the same contraindication but more definite conclusions cannot be made until higher quality evidence is available.


Open AccessPeer Reviewed
Full Text:

Full Text PDF


Click to see References Click to hide References
References

  1. Hottenrott, V.C., et al. (1983) Anastomotic problems in colonic surgery. Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie. 108: 1263–1271.
  2. Kott, I., and Lurie, M. (1973) The effects of electrosurgery and the surgical knife on the healing of intestinal anastomoses. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 16: 33–38. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02589907
  3. Pollinger, H.S., et al. (2003) Comparison of wound-healing characteristics with feedback circuit electrosurgical generators in a porcine model. The American Surgeon. 69: 1054–1060.
  4. Regadas, S.M.M., et al. (2005) Experimental model of laparoscopic handsewn suture in colon of dogs. Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira 20: 323–328. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-86502005000400011
  5. Spalding, H., and Heath, T. (1987) Arterial supply to the pig intestine: an unusual pattern in the mesentery. Anatomical Record. 218: 27–29. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ar.1092180106
  6. Thornton, F.J., and Barbul, A. (1997) Healing in the gastrointestinal tract. Surgical Clinics of North America. 77: 549–573. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6109(05)70568-5
  7. Williams, J.M. (2017) Colon. In: Veterinary Surgery: Small Animal, 2nd, eds K.M. Tobias, S.A. Johnston, Elsevier, St. Louis, MO, USA, pp. 1767–1771.


Refbacks
  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Emmanouil Tzimtzimis

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Made possible through a project grant from the RCVS Council.

RCVS