Staircase of evidence

The Staircase of Evidence – a New Metaphor Displaying the Core Principles of Evidence-based Veterinary Medicine

Sebastian Patrick Arlt, Wolfgang Heuwieser

Published:  22/01/2016    in:  Articles
Views
1025
HTML:
2066
PDF:
428



Staircase of evidence
Abstract

Background: Veterinary practitioners and clinicians should base their clinical decisions on the best evidence obtainable to provide best patient care. The evidence of information concerning diagnostic or therapeutic procedures and disease prevention can be ranked from weak to strong based on the methodology the information is generated by. Teaching the concepts and strategies of Evidence-based Veterinary Medicine, however, can be challenging. Students and practitioners should become competent in defining a clinical problem, retrieving of information from the literature and independent critical thinking. Several authors illustrated the levels of evidence ranked from strongest to weakest using a pyramid metaphor. The basis reflects information of the lowest evidence and towards the tip the evidence increases. The metaphorical concept of the pyramid, i.e. solid foundation and a narrow tip, however, does not adequately represent the hierarchy of evidence as the high evidence levels are represented by narrow fields and vice versa.

Results: We propose an alternative schematic which may be used in order to display the respective evidence levels as a staircase. A reading pictogram character illustrates that the search for information should start at the highest step. To assess which metaphor can be more easily interpreted and is intuitively accessible a survey among 5th semester veterinary students was performed which was completed by 100 respondents. According to the results both metaphors adequately display the hierarchy of evidence. The staircase better represents the fact that high evidence information is more likely to be true and that one should start to look for high evidence when searching information. In contrast more students found that the pyramid represents distracting information i. e. that opinions and information from the internet provide a solid knowledge base.

Conclusions: The staircase of evidence displays better the evidentiary value of information and how to perform a search for information of high evidence compared to the pyramid of evidence. It therefore can help to teach information search and interpretation strategies in order to answer specific clinical questions.

Full Text:

HTML PDF


Click to see References Click to hide References
References

  1. Achterberg, C.; McDonnell, E. And Bagby, R. (1994) How to put the food guide pyramid into practice. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 94(9) pp 1030–1035. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-8223(94)92198-9
  2. Antman, E. M. et al. (1992) A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction. Journal of the American Medical Association 268(2). pp 240-248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.1992.03490020088036
  3. Arlt, S.; Dicty, V. and Heuwieser, W. (2010) Evidence-Based Medicine in Canine Reproduction: Quality of Current Available Literature. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 45(6). pp 1052-1058 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2009.01492.x
  4. Arlt, S. and Heuwieser, W. (2005) Evidenz-Basierte Veterinärmedizin. Deutsche Tieraerztliche Wochenschrift 112(4) pp 146-148.
  5. Arlt, S. P. and Heuwieser, W. (2014): Evidence-based Medicine in Animal Reproduction. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 49(s3) pp 11-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rda.12323
  6. Bale, V. (2006) How my practice of using manipulatives in teaching multiplying and dividing fractions influences the student’s conceptual understanding of these operations. B.S. University of Central Florida
  7. Balshem, H. et al. (2011) GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 64(4) pp 401-406. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.015
  8. Bassler, D.and Antes, G. (2000) Wie erhalte ich Antworten auf meine Fragen. In: Kunz, R et al Evidenzbasierte Medizin in Klinik und Praxis. Köln: Dt. Ärzteverlag pp 89-97.
  9. Cardwell, J. M. (2008) An overview of study design. Journal of Small Animal Practice 49(5) pp 217-218 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5827.2008.00594.x
  10. Cockcroft, P.and Holmes, M. (2003) Research Studies. In: Cockcroft, P.and Holmes, M Handbook of Evidence-Based Veterinary Medicine. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing pp 67-83 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470690833.ch5
  11. Daly, J. et al. (2007) A hierarchy of evidence for assessing qualitative health research. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 60(1) pp 43-49 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.014
  12. Davis, C. A. et al (2001):Past, present, and future of the Food Guide Pyramid. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 101(8) pp 881–885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0002-8223(01)00217-6
  13. Donner-Banzhoff, N. (2009)Pragmatic trials in a routine care setting. Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen 103(6) pp 404-409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.zefq.2009.05.022
  14. Evans, R.; and O’Connor, A. (2007) Statistics and Evidence-Based Veterinary Medicine: answers to 21 common statistical questions that arise from reading scientific manuscripts. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice 37(3).pp 477-486 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cvsm.2007.01.006
  15. Greenhalgh, T.; Howick, J.and Maskrey, N. (2014) Evidence based medicine: a movement in crisis? British Medical Journal 348.g3725 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g3725
  16. Gugiu, P. C.;and Gugiu, M. R. (2010) A Critical Appraisal of Standard Guidelines for Grading Levels of Evidence. Evaluation and the Health Professions 33(3) pp 233-255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0163278710373980
  17. Haimerl, P.; Arlt, S. P. and Heuwieser, W. (2013) Entscheidungsfindung in der tierärztlichen Praxis. Tierarztliche Praxis 4(4) pp 229-236.
  18. Hardin, L. E.; and Robertson, S. (2006) Learning Evidence-Based Veterinary Medicine through Development of a Critically Appraised Topic. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education 33(3).pp 474-478 http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/jvme.33.3.474
  19. Harris, R. P.; et al. (2001) Current methods of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: A review of the process. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 20(3S1) pp 21–35 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(01)00261-6
  20. Holmes, M. and Ramey, D. (2007) An Introduction to Evidence-Based Veterinary Medicine. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Equine Practice 23(2) pp 191-200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cveq.2007.03.001
  21. Holmes, M. A. (2007) Evaluation of the evidence. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice 37(3). pp 447-62 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cvsm.2007.01.004
  22. Ilic, D, and Maloney, S. (2014) Methods of teaching medical trainees evidence-based medicine: a systematic review. Medical Education 48(2) pp 124-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/medu.12288
  23. Ilic, D.; Tepper, K.; and Misso, M. (2011) Teaching evidence based medicine literature searching skills to medical students during the clinical years - a protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMC Medical Education 11:49 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-11-49
  24. Kochevar, D.and Fajt, V. (2006) Evidence-based decision making in small animal therapeutics. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice. 36(5) pp 943-959. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cvsm.2006.06.001
  25. Lean, I. J.; et al (2009)Invited review: Use of meta-analysis in animal health and reproduction: methods and applications. Journal of Dairy Science 92(8) pp 3545-3565 http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2140
  26. Lohr, K. N. (2004) Rating the strength of scientific evidence: relevance for quality improvement programs. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 16(1) pp 9-18 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzh005
  27. Miles, S. et al. (2010) Statistics teaching in medical school: opinions of practising doctors. BMC Medical Education 10:75 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-10-75
  28. Nault, A. J.and Baker, H. J. (2011) The power of information. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education 38(1). pp 3-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/jvme.38.1.3
  29. Oxford Levels of Evidence 2 [Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine – OCEBM Levels of Evidence Working Group] [online] Available from: http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=5653 [Accessed 05/01/2016].
  30. Petrisor, B. A. and Bhandari, M. (2006a) Principles of teaching evidence-based medicine. Injury 37(4) pp 335-339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2006.01.027
  31. Petrisor, B. A.; Keating, J. and Schemitsch, E. H. (2006b) Grading the evidence: Levels of evidence and grades of recommendation. Injury 37(4). pp 321-327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2006.02.001
  32. Rubin, A. (2008) Practitioner's guide to using research for evidence-based practice. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  33. Sackett, D. L.; et al. (1996) Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. British Medical Journal 312(71) pp 71-72 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71
  34. Salmond, S. W. (2007) Advancing evidence-based practice: A primer. Orthopaedic Nursing 26(2) pp114–123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.NOR.0000265869.72265.0a
  35. Sargeant, J. M.; Kelton, D. F. and O'Connor, A. M. (2014a) Study Designs and Systematic Reviews of Interventions: Building Evidence Across Study Designs. Zoonoses and Public Health 61(S1). pp 10-17 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/zph.12127
  36. Sargeant, J. M.and O'Connor, A. M. (2014b) Introduction to Systematic Reviews in Animal Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine. Zoonoses and Public Health 61(S1). pp3-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/zph.12128
  37. Schmidt, P. (2007) Evidence-based veterinary medicine: evolution, revolution, or repackaging of veterinary practice? Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice 37(3). pp 409-417 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cvsm.2007.01.001
  38. Simoneit, C.; Heuwieser, W.and Arlt, S. P. (2011) Evidence-based medicine in bovine, equine and canine reproduction: quality of current literature. Theriogenology 76(6). pp 1042-1050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2011.05.007
  39. Simoneit, C.; Heuwieser, W.; and Arlt, S. P. (2012) Inter-observer Agreement on a Checklist to Evaluate Scientific Publications in the Field of Animal Reproduction. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education 39(2) pp 119-127 http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/jvme.1111.113R
  40. Steele, M. et al. (2013) Online tools for teaching evidence-based veterinary medicine. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education 40(3). pp 272-277 http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/jvme.0113-010R1
  41. Straus, S. E.and Sackett, D. L. (1998) Using research findings in clinical practice. British Medical Journal 317(339). pp 339-342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.317.7154.339
  42. Vandeweerd, J. M. Et al. (2012a) Using Systematic Reviews to Critically Appraise the Scientific Information for the Bovine Veterinarian. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice 28(1).pp 13-21 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cvfa.2011.12.002
  43. Vandeweerd, J. M. et al. (2012b) Is evidence-based medicine so evident in veterinary research and practice? History, obstacles and perspectives. Veterinary Journal 191(1) pp 28–34 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2011.04.013
  44. Weiner, S. A.; Stephens, G.and Nour, A. Y. M. (2011) Information-Seeking behaviours of First-Semester veterinary students: a preliminary report. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education 38(1) pp 21-32 http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/jvme.38.1.21


Refbacks
  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Sebastian Patrick Arlt

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Made possible through a project grant from the RCVS Council.

RCVS