KNOWLEDGE SUMMARY
Keywords: BEHAVIOUR; COWS; HEIFERS; NSAIDS; PAIN; PAIN-RELIEF; PARTURITION; WELFARE
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug administration to periparturient cows to reduce postpartum pain-related behaviours
Amelia Cannadine, BVB DVM1*
1 The University of Sydney, Australia
* Corresponding author email: amelia.cannadine13@gmail.com
Vol 9, Issue 3 (2024)
Submitted: 22 Jul 2023; published: 18 Oct 2024; next review: 31 Jan 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18849/ve.v9i4.692
PICO question
In periparturient cows does the administration of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) aid in reducing pain-related behaviours after parturition when compared to cows not administered NSAIDs?
Clinical bottom line
Category of research
Treatment.
Number and type of study designs reviewed
Four randomised control trials.
Strength of evidence
Moderate.
Outcomes reported
The evidence suggests that NSAIDs can reduce some pain-related behaviours and increase resting behaviours in postpartum cows, with the effect being most consistently observed when administered between 6 and 48 hours before calving or within 3 hours after calving. This effect was most consistently observed in individuals that had experienced uncomplicated calving events and primiparous animals. Primiparous animals administered meloxicam prior to natural calving displayed significantly more lying bouts on the day of calving when compared to primiparous control animals and primiparous animals administered meloxicam postpartum. A separate study reported that cows administered ketoprofen spent less time in lateral recumbency than cows in the placebo group, irrespective of whether calving was assisted. Additionally, when treatment cows were in sternal recumbency, they spent more time with their head in a rested position than the placebo group. There was no significant difference in feeding behaviours postpartum between treatment and placebo animals. There were conflicting results between papers assessing activity levels.
Conclusion
In some cows, in particular cows with an uncomplicated parturition, NSAIDs can reduce some pain-related behaviours and increase some resting behaviours postpartum. The NSAID should be administered between 6 and 48 hours before calving or within 3 hours after calving.
How to apply this evidence in practice
The application of evidence into practice should take into account multiple factors, not limited to: individual clinical expertise, patient’s circumstances and owners’ values, country, location or clinic where you work, the individual case in front of you, the availability of therapies and resources.
Knowledge Summaries are a resource to help reinforce or inform decision making. They do not override the responsibility or judgement of the practitioner to do what is best for the animal in their care.
Clinical scenario
In recent decades, awareness around the importance of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in animals has increased dramatically (Edwards, 2021). NSAIDs have been reported to be efficacious at reducing pain inflicted on cattle during husbandry procedures, such as castration, dehorning, and disbudding (Steagall et al., 2021). However, it is not only these procedures that have proved to induce pain in cattle. The literature has demonstrated the presence of an inflammatory state in postpartum cows from the tissue trauma associated with calving, even in healthy individuals (Humblet et al., 2006; Trimboli et al., 2020).
To date, the effects of postpartum analgesia on production parameters has been the focus in existing literature (Carpenter et al., 2016). However, very few studies include measures more typically considered to be sensitive indicators of welfare status, such as behaviour. Lying, for example, is a biologically important behaviour associated with sleeping and ruminating which can be reduced if an animal is experiencing stress, and potentially pain can have a similar effect (Gladden et al., 2021; Ruckebusch, 1975; Tucker et al., 2021). Given that pain is a primary welfare concern, determining whether the provision of immediate postpartum analgesia provides welfare benefits is essential, particularly in primiparous cows or in cows experiencing, or expected to experience, varying severities of dystocia (Gladden et al., 2021). Thus, evaluation of the evidence that measures behavioural parameters in periparturient cows administered NSAIDs is required to inform veterinarians and producers whether such a protocol can optimise welfare in the breeding herd.
The evidence
The evidence consists only of randomised control trials, which are ranked as high-level evidence due to their unbiased design and minimal risk of systematic errors (Burns et al., 2011; Sargeant et al., 2022). The evidence is weakened by those studies that omitted evidence of sample size calculations or 95% confidence, which would have evaluated whether sample size was sufficient, thus we cannot confirm whether there were enough study subjects to reduce type two errors (Jones et al., 2003; Mainau et al., 2014; Swartz et al., 2018). Furthermore, the variation in methodology between the papers limits the ability to compare them. Three NSAID types were utilised amongst the studies, namely, meloxicam (Mainau et al., 2014; Swartz et al., 2018), ketoprofen (Gladden et al., 2021), and acetylsalicylic acid (Barragan et al., 2020). Only one study included administration of an NSAID prior to calving as part of their protocol (Swartz et al., 2018), whilst administration post-calving was conducted in four of the studies (Barragan et al., 2020; Gladden et al., 2021; Mainau et al., 2014; Swartz et al., 2018). The studies containing the greatest number of significant findings for the reduction in pain-related behaviours and the promotion of resting behaviours came from those cows that were administered an NSAID prior to or promptly after parturition.
Summary of the evidence
Barragan et al. (2020)
Population: |
Postpartum dairy cows (breed not reported) that did not experience a fetotomy or caesarean or were not diagnosed as having a health disorder in the first week of lactation were included in the study. This study was performed between May and July 2016 in three organic dairy farms in Colorado, USA, that milked 3,000–5,300 cows. |
---|---|
Sample size: |
464 cows. |
Intervention details: |
|
Study design: |
Randomised control trial. |
Outcome studied: |
|
Main findings |
|
Limitations: |
|
Gladden et al. (2021)
Population: |
Holstein dairy cows from a 700 dairy cow herd in Scotland were recruited (year not reported) provided that they were not lame, they had no signs of clinical illness at parturition, and they gave birth to a live female Holstein calf. |
---|---|
Sample size: |
72 cows recruited. |
Intervention details: |
|
Study design: |
Randomised control trial. |
Outcome studied: |
|
Main findings |
|
Limitations: |
|
Mainau et al. (2014)
Population: |
The study took place in Spain between September and December 2008. Cows (from first to sixth parity) from a commercial dairy farm that had 1000 Friesian dairy cows were selected given they had an acceptable body condition score (≥ 2.5 and ≤ 3.5), did not have lameness, and had no other clinical sign of illness. Only calving that required no assistance or assisted calving by means of an easy manual pull applied only by 1 person were studied. Dystocic calvings, stillbirths, cases that required additional anti-inflammatory treatment, and twin calvings were excluded. |
---|---|
Sample size: |
60 cows. |
Intervention details: |
|
Study design: |
Blinded randomised control trial. |
Outcome studied: |
|
Main findings |
|
Limitations: |
|
Swartz et al. (2018)
Population: |
Pregnant dry cows and heifers (Holstein Friesians and Jerseys) that received their respective treatment in the window specified by their treatment group and that did not calve with twins or calve via caesarean. The study was conducted on a Dairy Research Complex in Virginia, USA, and enrollment occurred from August 2016 through August 2017. |
---|---|
Sample size: |
194 (87 multiparous Holstein, 48 primiparous Holstein, 41 multiparous Jersey, and 18 primiparous Jersey). |
Intervention details: |
|
Study design: |
Blind randomised control trial. |
Outcome studied: |
|
Main findings |
For the accelerometer behaviour measurements, some cows did not have day -3 data, thus the final sample size for behavioural data included only 165 animals. Lying time:
Activity:
Number of lying bouts:
Lying bout duration:
|
Limitations: |
|
Appraisal, application and reflection
Five randomised control trials were included in the analysis. Two of the studies did not state whether there was blinding of study personnel (Barragan et al., 2020; Gladden et al., 2021) as the element of observer bias may influence the outcome. Studies by Swartz et al. (2018) and Mainau et al. (2014) omitted calculations to determine the sample size required to deliver sufficient study power and there was no evidence of 95% confidence intervals to evaluate whether their chosen sample size was sufficient. Consequently, some of the non-significant results may be an artefact of low power, limiting the reliability of each study’s conclusions. This may stand for those studies that utilised a small subset of the study animals for the behavioural analysis component, without a sample size calculation to justify the number of individuals within these smaller subsets, the reliability of the results is questionable (Barragan et al., 2020; Gladden et al., 2021). It is important to address that these analyses are of a subjective nature and must be interpreted with caution. Nevertheless, all of the studies had at least one significant finding relating to pain-related behaviour in postpartum cows.
There were no reports of retained placenta or stillbirths associated with NSAID administration in any of these studies. The papers that utilised meloxicam all reported that there was no association between the incidence of adverse outcome post-calving and NSAID administration (Mainau et al., 2014; Swartz et al., 2018). However, the paper that utilised ketoprofen did measure the incidence of these undesirable side-effects, but the outcome was not reported (Gladden et al., 2021).
Studies using flunixin meglumine were excluded from this analysis as cows treated with Flunixin post-calving had an increased risk of retained placentas, still births and metritis (Duffield et al., 2009; Newby et al., 2017). This is due to its propensity to preferentially inhibit cyclooxygenase 1 (COX-1), in contrast to meloxicam which is predominately a cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) inhibitor (Trimboli et al., 2020). Thus, it has been recommended that flunixin should not be administered to cattle within 24 hours of parturition (Newby et al., 2017). Ketoprofen’s COX selectivity in cows has not been reported, but it has been reported to lower incidence of retained foetal membranes (Richards et al., 2009). Acetylsalicylic acid has been reported to be a weak inhibitor of both COX isoforms (Barragan et al., 2020). However, the paper that utilised acetylsalicylic acid did not report on the incidence of any of the aforementioned undesirable effects (Barragan et al., 2020).
Lying was reported in all of the papers included in the analysis. When primiparous animals were administered meloxicam prior to natural calving, they displayed significantly more lying bouts on the day of calving when compared to primiparous control animals and primiparous animals that were administered meloxicam postpartum (Swartz et al., 2018). Interestingly, the number of lying bouts in the pre-calving meloxicam group on the day of calving was more similar to the multiparous cows (Swartz et al., 2018). Furthermore, primiparous controls and primiparous animals that received meloxicam postpartum had significantly fewer bouts of lying on the day of calving than all treatment groups of multiparous cows (Swartz et al., 2018). Multiparous animals typically deliver more easily than primiparous animals, but this data suggests that the anti-inflammatory effects of pre-calving meloxicam in primiparous animals allows for an easier calving, or a calving comparable to that of multiparous cows (Swartz et al., 2018). Although these conclusions are not measuring the reduction in a pain-related behaviour and thus are not directly aligned with the research question, the presence of a behaviour associated with the reduction in pain is important to report. The study that administered meloxicam to their treatment animals’ postpartum concluded insignificant lying results (Mainau, 2014). However, significant lying results were also reported in a study by Barrier et al., 2014 which stated that when cows undergoing a caesarean were administered meloxicam prior to the first incision, they spent more time lying and had more bouts of lying within the first 16 hours and 24 hours respectively, when compared to the placebo group (Barrier et al., 2014).
The study by Swartz et al. (2018) relied on the drop in rectal temperature that occurs prior to parturition to aid in calving detection. This method of detection has moderate accuracy (at best) and resulted in 43 cows being removed from the study as they did not receive the pre-calving treatment within the specified timeframe. This demonstrates that the application of administering meloxicam before calving is challenging. Advances in identifying the onset of calving through technology that measures rumination, lying and activity provides promising potential in this space (Borchers et al., 2017; Fadul et al., 2017).
To support the theory that NSAID administration reduces pain postpartum, the Gladden et al. (2021) study analysed specific lying postures found that all cows administered ketoprofen spent less time in lateral recumbency than cows treated with saline, irrespective of whether calving was assisted. Lateral recumbency in adult cattle is considered an abnormal lying posture exhibited when animals are in pain or are unwell (Hudson et al., 2008; Petherick et al., 2014). Therefore, this suggests that pain is experienced after parturition in all cows and ketoprofen administration improves comfort irrespective of parturition experience (Gladden et al., 2021). It is important to recognise that this conclusion is drawn based on the theory that lateral recumbency in cattle is an indicator of pain. Additionally, when treatment cows were in sternal recumbency, they spent more time with their head in a rested position than the placebo group (Gladden et al., 2021). Such posture is usually adopted when in a deep sleep (i.e., rapid eye movement sleep) (Ruckebusch, 1975). It is possible that pain reduced the duration of the placebo group’s sleep, explaining why the placebo group spent less time with their head rested (Gladden et al., 2021; Ruckebusch, 1975). The Gladden et al., 2021 study only included parturition events that produced live dairy female Holstein calves (Gladden et al., 2021). Considering that male dairy calves consistently weigh more than females the selection of only female associated calving events limits the usefulness of this data and its ability to be extrapolated to all calving events (Dhakal et al., 2013; Olson et al., 2009).
Activity measures of the study animals were taken either via the use of accelerometers or pedometers (Barragan et al., 2020; Mainau et al., 2014; Swartz et al., 2018). One study found no significant effects in eutocic animals (Swartz et al., 2018). However, dystocic animals in this study that received meloxicam prior to or after calving were less active than the dystocic control animals postpartum (Swartz et al., 2018). The administration of meloxicam may have reduced activity by alleviating inflammation, allowing cows to rest more easily postpartum (Swartz et al., 2018). Conversely, studies also concluded that cows or heifers treated with NSAID postpartum had increased activity when compared to the control animals and that postpartum administration does lead to a reduction in inflammatory mediators, ameliorating behaviours associated with pain, and allowing these individuals to exhibit their normal behaviours (Barragan et al., 2020; and Mainau et al., 2014). Consequently, activity as a behavioural measure was difficult to analyse due to the conflicting findings presented.
Two of the studies assessed the differences in feeding behaviour postpartum (Gladden et al., 2021; Mainau et al., 2014) . These studies did not find a significant result regarding feeding behaviour. These insignificant results could have been explained by the adoption of scan methodology whereby feeding was measured in 10- or 20-minute intervals. Feeding behaviours are better represented by shorter sample intervals (Gladden et al., 2021; Mainau et al., 2014; Mitlöhner et al., 2001). Thus, it is possible that the proportion of time spent feeding was underestimated as the chosen interval was not sensitive enough to detect a change in feeding behaviour (Gladden et al., 2021; Mainau et al., 2014). Due to the discrepancy in the results reported and the potential that the scan methodology adopted could have had an influence, the need for further exploration into NSAID effect on feeding behaviour postpartum is validated.
Upon critical analysis, NSAID proved to reduce pain-related behaviours or increase resting behaviours in postpartum cows most consistently when they were administered 48 hours prior to but no less than 6 hours before calving, or within three hours of calving (Gladden et al., 2021; Swartz et al., 2018). This conclusion proved to be most consistent in individuals that had experienced uncomplicated calving events, primiparous animals and potentially those that experienced dystocia; however, due to the conflicting analysis of activity between studies, this should be interpreted with caution (Gladden et al., 2021; Swartz et al., 2018). This analysis has revealed that the inflammatory state that has been identified and reported on in postpartum cows which experienced uneventful calving could be dampened down by NSAID administration (Gladden et al., 2021). Additionally, multiparous animals typically deliver calves more easily than primiparous cows, but the literature suggests NSAID administration to primiparous cows in the recommended time frame could allow for a calving experience similar to that of a multiparous cow (Swartz et al., 2018). As a result, if NSAID are introduced into primiparous calving protocols to improve calving ease, not only could the culling rates of animals who experienced calving difficulties be reduced, but animal welfare could be improved (MLA, 2019; Swartz et al., 2018). To explore this further, and due to the low numbers of studies which focuses on NSAID administration to cows that experienced uncomplicated calving events, are primiparous or that experienced dystocia more research is warranted.
Interestingly, two included studies measured milk yield postpartum and found that milk-yield was greater in the cows administered NSAID when compared to those that received a placebo (Barragan et al., 2020; Swartz et al., 2018). It cannot be denied that administration of NSAID to cows is laborious for producers but the increase in milk-yield may provide them with some incentive to consider administering NSAID to cows approaching parturition or promptly post-parturition.
Methodology
Search strategy
Databases searched and dates covered: |
CAB Abstracts Web of Science Core Collection from 1910 to 31 January 2024 |
---|---|
Search strategy: |
CAB Abstracts: TS=(Cows OR Cattle NOT calves) AND TS=(behaviour OR behavior) AND TS=(Parturition) AND TS=(Flunixin OR Ketoprofen OR meloxicam OR NSAID OR Tolfenamic acid OR acetylsalicylic acid OR aspirin) Medline: (cows.mp. or cattle/) and (behaviour.mp. or behavior/) and (parturition/) and (flunixin.mp. or ketoprofen/ or meloxicam/ or anti-inflammatory agents, non-steroidal/ or tolfenamic acid.mp. or acetylsalicylic acid.mp. or aspirin/) |
Dates searches performed: |
31 Jan 2024 |
Exclusion / inclusion criteria
Exclusion: |
Systematic reviews or meta-analyses of randomised control studies, review articles, conference proceedings, case reports/studies that are irrelevant to the PICO. |
---|---|
Inclusion: |
Studies must contain information that is relevant to the PICO question, and they must be randomised control trials. |
Search outcome
Database |
Number of results |
Excluded – Systematic reviews and meta-analysis of RCTs |
Excluded – Review Articles |
Excluded – Conference proceedings |
Excluded – Case report/study |
Excluded – irrelevant to PICO |
Total relevant papers |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAB Abstracts |
18 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
4 |
Medline |
9 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
3 |
Total relevant papers when duplicates removed |
4 |
ORCiD
Amelia Cannadine: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0147-6601
Conflict of interest
The author declares no conflicts of interest.
References
- Barragan, A. A., Bauman, L., da Costa, L., Velez, J., Gonzalez, J. D. R., Schuenemann, G. M., Menichetti., Piñeiro J. & Bas, S. (2020). Administration of acetylsalicylic acid after parturition in lactating dairy cows under certified organic management: Part I. Milk yield, milk components, activity patterns, fertility, and health. Journal of Dairy Science, 103(12), 11697–11712. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2020-18388
- Barrier, A. C., Coombs, T. M., Dwyer, C. M., Haskell, M. J., & Goby, L. (2014). Administration of a NSAID (meloxicam) affects lying behaviour after caesarean section in beef cows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 155, 28–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2014.02.015
- Borchers, M. R., Chang, Y. M., Proudfoot, K. L., Wadsworth, B. A., Stone, A. E., & Bewley, J. M. (2017). Machine-learning-based calving prediction from activity, lying, and ruminating behaviors in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 100(7), 5664–5674. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-11526
- Burns, P. B., Rohrich, R. J., & Chung, K. C. (2011). The Levels of Evidence and Their Role in Evidence-Based Medicine. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 128(1), 305–310. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e318219c171
- Carpenter, A. J., Ylioja, C. M., Vargas, C. F., Mamedova, L. K., Mendonça, L. G., Coetzee, J. F., Hollis, L. C., Gehring, R. & Bradford, B. J. (2016). Hot topic: Early postpartum treatment of commercial dairy cows with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs increases whole-lactation milk yield. Journal of Dairy Science, 99(1), 672–679. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-10048
- Dhakal, K., Maltecca, C., Cassady, J. P., Baloche, G., Williams, C. M. & Washburn, S. P. (2013). Calf birth weight, gestation length, calving ease, and neonatal calf mortality in Holstein, Jersey, and crossbred cows in a pasture system. Journal of Dairy Science, 96(1), 690–698. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-5817
- Duffield, T., Dingwell, H. P., Skidmore, A., Weary, D., Neuder, L., Rapheal, W., Millman. S, Newby, N. & Leslie, K. (2009). Effect of Flunixin Meglumine Treatment Following Parturition on Cow Health and Milk Production. American Association of Bovine Practitioners Conference Proceedings, 188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21423/aabppro20094315
- Edwards, S. H. (2021). Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs in Animals. MSD Veterinary Manual [online]. Available at: https://www.msdvetmanual.com/pharmacology/inflammation/nonsteroidal-anti-inflammatory-drugs-in-animals [Accessed 13th July 2023].
- Fadul, M., Bogdahn, C., Alsaaod, M., Hüsler, J., Starke, A., Steiner, A. & Hirsbrunner, G. (2017). Prediction of calving time in dairy cattle. Animal Reproduction Science, 187, 37–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2017.10.003
- Gladden, N., Ellis, K., Martin, J. & McKeegan, D. (2021). Administration of ketoprofen affects post-partum lying behaviours of Holstein dairy cows regardless of whether parturition is assisted. Veterinary Record, 189(6), e300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/vetr.300
- Hudson, C., Whay, H. & Huxley, J. (2008). Recognition and management of pain in cattle. In Practice, 30(3), 126–134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/inpract.30.3.126
- Humblet, M.-F., Guyot, H., Boudry, B., Mbayahi, F., Hanzen, C., Rollin, F. & Godeau, J.-M. (2006). Relationship between haptoglobin, serum amyloid A, and clinical status in a survey of dairy herds during a 6-month period. Veterinary Clinical Pathology, 35(2), 188–193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-165X.2006.tb00112.x
- Jones, S. R., Carley, S. & Harrison, M. (2003). An introduction to power and sample size estimation. Emergency Medicine Journal, 20(5), 453–458. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1136/emj.20.5.453
- Mainau, E., Cuevas, A., Ruiz-de-la-Torre, J. L., Abbeloos, E. & Manteca, X. (2014). Effect of meloxicam administration after calving on milk production, acute phase proteins, and behavior in dairy cows. Journal of Veterinary Behavior, 9(6), 357–363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2014.07.007
- Mitlöhner, F. M., Morrow-Tesch, J. L., Wilson, S. C., Dailey, J. W. & McGlone, J. J. (2001). Behavioral sampling techniques for feedlot cattle. Journal of Animal Science, 79(5), 1189–1193. DOI: http://doi.org/10.2527/2001.7951189x
- Meat & Livestock Australia [online]. (2019). 4-Cull and replace females. Available at: https://mbfp.mla.com.au/weaner-throughput/4-cull-and-replace-females/ [Accessed 21th July 2023].
- Newby, N. C., Leslie, K. E., Dingwell, H. D. P., Kelton, D. F., Weary, D. M., Neuder, L., Millman, S. T. & Duffield, T. F. (2017). The effects of periparturient administration of flunixin meglumine on the health and production of dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 100(1), 582–587. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-11747
- Olson, K. M., Cassell, B. G., McAllister, A. J. & Washburn, S. P. (2009). Dystocia, stillbirth, gestation length, and birth weight in Holstein, Jersey, and reciprocal crosses from a planned experiment. Journal of Dairy Science, 92(12), 6167–6175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2260
- Petherick, J. C., Small, A. H., Mayer, D. G., Colditz, I. G., Ferguson, D. M. & Stafford, K. J. (2014). A comparison of welfare outcomes for weaner and mature Bos indicus bulls surgically or tension band castrated with or without analgesia: 1. Behavioural responses. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 157, 23–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2014.05.003
- Richards, B. D., Black, D. H., Christley, R. M., Royal, M. D., Smith, R. F. & Dobson, H. (2009). Effects of the administration of ketoprofen at parturition on the milk yield and fertility of Holstein-Friesian cattle. Veterinary Record, 165(4), 102–106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/vetrec.165.4.102
- Ruckebusch, Y. (1975). Feeding and sleep patterns of cows prior to and post parturition. Applied Animal Ethology, 1, 283–292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3762(75)90021-8
- Sargeant, J. M., Brennan, M. L. & O'Connor, A. M. (2022). Levels of Evidence, Quality Assessment, and Risk of Bias: Evaluating the Internal Validity of Primary Research. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.960957
- Steagall, P. V., Bustamante, H., Johnson, C. B. & Turner, P. V. (2021). Pain Management in Farm Animals: Focus on Cattle, Sheep and Pigs. Animals, 11(6), 1483. DOI: http://doi.org/10.3390/ani11061483
- Swartz, T. H., Schramm, H. H., Bewley, J. M., Wood, C. M., Leslie, K. E. & Petersson-Wolfe, C. S. (2018). Meloxicam administration either prior to or after parturition: Effects on behavior, health, and production in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 101(11), 10151–10167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-14657
- Trimboli, F., Ragusa, M., Piras, C., Lopreiato, V. & Britti, D. (2020). Outcomes from Experimental Testing of Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug (NSAID) Administration during the Transition Period of Dairy Cows. Animals, 10(10), 1832. DOI: http://doi.org/10.3390/ani10101832
- Tucker, C. B., Jensen, M. B., de Passillé, A. M., Hänninen, L. & Rushen, J. (2021). Invited review: Lying time and the welfare of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 104(1), 20–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2019-18074
Contribute to the evidence
There are two main ways you can contribute to the evidence base while also enhancing your CPD:
- Tell us your information need
- Write a Knowledge Summary
Either way, you will be helping to add to the evidence base, and strengthen the decisions that veterinary professionals around the world make to give animals the best possible care.
Learn more here: https://veterinaryevidence.org/index.php/ve/guidelines-for-authors
Licence
Copyright (c) 2024 Amelia Cannadine
Intellectual property rights
Authors of Knowledge Summaries submitted to RCVS Knowledge for publication will retain copyright in their work, and will be required to grant to RCVS Knowledge a non-exclusive licence to publish including but not limited to the right to publish, re-publish, transmit, sell, distribute and otherwise use the materials in all languages and all media throughout the world, and to licence or permit others to do so.
Disclaimer
Knowledge Summaries are a peer-reviewed article type which aims to answer a clinical question based on the best available current evidence. It does not override the responsibility of the practitioner. Informed decisions should be made by considering such factors as individual clinical expertise and judgement along with patient’s circumstances and owners’ values. Knowledge Summaries are a resource to help inform and any opinions expressed within the Knowledge Summaries are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect the view of the RCVS Knowledge. Authors are responsible for the accuracy of the content. While the Editor and Publisher believe that all content herein are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication, they accept no legal responsibility for any errors or omissions, and make no warranty, express or implied, with respect to material contained within. For further information please refer to our Terms of Use.
