KNOWLEDGE SUMMARY
Keywords: CANINE; CANCER; CYTOLOGY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; ROUND CELL TUMOURS; ULTRASOUND
Accuracy of ultrasound detecting splenic and hepatic round cell neoplasia in dogs compared to cytology and histopathology
Ernest Martinez Martinez, DVM PgC(DI) MRCVS1*
1 Royal Veterinary College, London, United Kingdom
* Corresponding author email: ernestmartinezvet@gmail.com
Vol 10, Issue 4 (2025)
Submitted 14 Aug 2024; Published: 10 Nov 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18849/ve.v10i4.724
PICO question
In dogs, how accurate is abdominal ultrasound in detecting round cell neoplasia in the liver and spleen when compared to cytological or histopathological diagnosis?
Clinical bottom line
Category of research
Diagnosis.
Number and type of study designs reviewed
Twelve studies were appraised in total. Ten of them were retrospective cohort studies, and only two were prospective studies.
Strength of evidence
Moderate.
Outcomes reported
Ultrasonography is useful for initial evaluation of canine liver and spleen but shows limited diagnostic certainty on its own. Across the studies, distinguishing benign from malignant change and differentiating among diffuse hepatopathies was inconsistent, and false negatives occurred despite normal-appearing organs. Detection of splenic involvement with aggressive mast cell disease was particularly unreliable, and ultrasound assessment of hepatic lymphoma was imperfect with overlapping appearances. Definitive case classification in the evidence base depended on cytology or histopathology rather than ultrasound alone.
Conclusion
Histopathological and cytological examination remains the gold standard for diagnosis, as ultrasound on its own is an unreliable tool for diagnosis of round cell tumours involving the spleen and the liver.
How to apply this evidence in practice
The application of evidence into practice should take into account multiple factors, not limited to: individual clinical expertise, patient’s circumstances and owners’ values, country, location or clinic where you work, the individual case in front of you, the availability of therapies and resources.
Knowledge Summaries are a resource to help reinforce or inform decision making. They do not override the responsibility or judgement of the practitioner to do what is best for the animal in their care.
The evidence
The strength of evidence across the studies, which involve dogs and address splenic and hepatic round cell neoplasia, varies due to differences in design and methodology. The majority of the studies are retrospective (10), which generally provide lower-quality evidence because of biases and limited control over data, highlighting ultrasound's variable sensitivity and specificity but lacking broader applicability (Book et al., 2011; Sato & Solano, 2004; Stefanello et al., 2009; Warren-Smith et al., 2012; Whiteley et al., 1989; Wrigley et al., 1988; Feeney et al., 2008; Finora et al., 2006; Crnogaj et al., 2021; Sumping et al., 2022). The two prospective studies (Crabtree et al., 2010; Ohlerth et al., 2008) offer stronger evidence by controlling data collection more effectively, yet their impact is still limited by sample size. Collectively, these studies emphasise that while ultrasound can provide useful diagnostic insights, its limitations in sensitivity and specificity necessitate complementary diagnostic methods like cytology or histology. The evidence suggests a cautious approach to changing clinical practice from diagnosis based on ultrasound alone, advocating for further prospective research to validate and refine these findings.
Summary of the evidence
Book et al. (2011)
Correlation of ultrasound findings, liver and spleen cytology, and prognosis in the clinical staging of high metastatic risk canine mast cell tumors
Aim: To compare abdominal ultrasonography with cytology for detecting hepatic and splenic mast cell infiltration and to assess whether cytological findings inform prognosis.
Population: |
Dogs with clinically aggressive grade II or III mast cell tumours. Location: Washington State University Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Pullman, USA. |
|---|---|
Sample size: |
19 dogs. |
Intervention details: |
|
Study design: |
Retrospective study. |
Outcome Studied: |
Objective assessment of the specificity and sensitivity of ultrasound for detecting mast cell infiltration and defining the prognostic role of cytologic evaluation of liver and spleen aspirates. |
Main Findings |
|
Limitations: |
|
Crabtree et al. (2010)
Diagnostic accuracy of gray-scale ultrasonography for the detection of hepatic and splenic lymphoma in dogs
Aim: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of greyscale ultrasonography for identifying hepatic and splenic lymphoma using cytology as the reference standard.
Population: |
Dogs with a confirmed diagnosis of multicentric lymphoma. Location: Auburn University College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn, USA. |
|---|---|
Sample size: |
28 dogs. |
Intervention details: |
|
Study design: |
Prospective study. |
Outcome Studied: |
Objective assessment of the accuracy of greyscale ultrasonography in detecting hepatic and splenic lymphoma compared to cytology. |
Main Findings |
|
Limitations: |
|
Crnogaj et al. (2021)
The clinical correlation of findings obtained by fine needle fenestration biopsy of the canine spleen with visible ultrasound changes
Aim: To evaluate how cytological results from splenic fine-needle fenestration biopsy relate to ultrasonographic lesion characteristics in dogs.
Population: |
Dogs with visible ultrasonographic changes. Location: Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia. |
|---|---|
Sample size: |
130 dogs. |
Intervention details: |
|
Study design: |
Retrospective study. |
Outcome Studied: |
To assess objectively, in dogs with ultrasonographically visible splenic changes, whether splenic FNFB cytology was clinically relevant or not, and to assess association between specific ultrasound features and those cytology categories. |
Main Findings |
|
Limitations: |
|
Feeney et al. (2008)
Statistical relevance of ultrasonographic criteria in the assessment of diffuse liver disease in dogs and cats
Aim: To test whether specific ultrasonographic criteria can discriminate among categories of diffuse hepatic disease, including round-cell neoplasia, in dogs and cats.
Population: |
Dogs and cats with diffuse liver disease, evaluated using ultrasonography and confirmed with histology or cytology. Location: University of Minnesota Veterinary Medical Center, Saint Paul, USA. |
|---|---|
Sample size: |
333 patients (229 dogs and 104 cats). |
Intervention details: |
|
Study design: |
Retrospective study. |
Outcome Studied: |
Accuracy of ultrasonographic criteria in distinguishing eight defined categories of diffuse liver disease in dogs and cats. |
Main Findings |
Ultrasonographic appearance was insufficient to discriminate among canine and feline diffuse infiltrative liver disease, including round cell neoplasia. |
Limitations: |
|
Finora et al. (2006)
Cytological comparison of fine-needle aspirates of liver and spleen of normal dogs and of dogs with cutaneous mast cell tumours and an ultrasonographically normal appearing liver and spleen
Aim: To compare hepatic and splenic cytology between unaffected dogs and dogs with cutaneous mast cell tumours but ultrasonographically normal organs, to judge the value of routine staging aspirates.
Population: |
Dogs with cutaneous mast cell tumours (cMCT) and ultrasonographically normal liver and spleen, and clinically normal dogs. Location: Animal Medical Center, New York, USA; and College of Veterinary Medicine, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA. |
|---|---|
Sample size: |
83 dogs. |
Intervention details: |
|
Study design: |
Retrospective study. |
Outcome Studied: |
Evaluation of the utility of routine hepatic and splenic aspirates in the staging of cMCT. |
Main Findings |
|
Limitations: |
|
Ohlerth et al. (2008)
Contrast Harmonic Imaging Characterization of Canine Splenic Lesions
Aim: To determine whether contrast harmonic ultrasonography can distinguish benign from malignant splenic lesions relative to cytology or histology.
Population: |
Dogs with splenic abnormalities detected during abdominal ultrasonography. Location: Vertsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Switzerland. |
|---|---|
Sample size: |
60 dogs. |
Intervention details: |
|
Study design: |
Prospective study. |
Outcome Studied: |
Objective assessment of the ability of contrast harmonic imaging to differentiate benign from malignant splenic lesions. |
Main Findings |
|
Limitations: |
|
Sato & Solano (2004)
Ultrasonographic findings in abdominal mast cell disease: a retrospective study of 19 patients
Aim: To describe the ultrasonographic features associated with confirmed mast cell infiltration in dogs and cats.
Population: |
Survey of ultrasound records in dogs and cats with cytologically or histopathologically confirmed abdominal cell disease. |
|---|---|
Sample size: |
19 patients (12 dogs and 7 cats). |
Intervention details: |
|
Study design: |
Retrospective study. |
Outcome Studied: |
Ultrasonographic features of hepatic, splenic, lymphatic, gastrointestinal, and renal mast cell infiltration. |
Main Findings |
|
Limitations: |
|
Stefanello et al. (2009)
Ultrasound-Guided Cytology of Spleen and Liver: A Prognostic Tool in Canine Cutaneous Mast Cell Tumor
Aim: To assess whether cytological evidence of hepatic or splenic mast cell infiltration predicts survival in dogs with cutaneous mast cell tumours.
Population: |
Dogs with cutaneous mast cell tumours (cMCT), with and without evidence of mast cell infiltration in the spleen and liver. Location: University of Milan, Milan, Italy. |
|---|---|
Sample size: |
52 dogs. |
Intervention details: |
|
Study design: |
Retrospective study. |
Outcome Studied: |
Survival times of dogs with and without cytological evidence of mast cell infiltration in the spleen and liver. |
Main Findings |
|
Limitations: |
|
Sumping et al. (2022)
Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography to detect hepatic and splenic lymphomatous infiltration in dogs and cats
Aim: To quantify the accuracy of ultrasonography for detecting hepatic and splenic lymphomatous infiltration and to identify sonographic features associated with infiltration or immunophenotype.
Population: |
Dogs and cats with cytologically or histologically confirmed lymphoma. Location: Small Animal Teaching Hospital, University of Liverpool, UK. |
|---|---|
Sample size: |
161 animals (132 dogs and 29 cats). |
Intervention details: |
|
Study design: |
Blinded retrospective evaluation. |
Outcome Studied: |
|
Main Findings |
|
Limitations: |
|
Warren-Smith et al. (2012)
Lack of associations between ultrasonographic appearance of parenchymal lesions of the canine liver and histological diagnosis
Aim: To determine whether ultrasonographic features of canine liver lesions are associated with histological diagnoses.
Population: |
Dogs that had abdominal ultrasonography and abnormal liver findings on biopsy or necropsy. Location: Queen Mother Hospital for Animals, Royal Veterinary College, North Mymms, UK. |
|---|---|
Sample size: |
371 dogs. |
Intervention details: |
Abdominal ultrasound followed by biopsy or necropsy for histological diagnosis. |
Study design: |
Retrospective review. |
Outcome Studied: |
Correlating ultrasonographic features and histological analysis of abnormal liver. |
Main Findings |
|
Limitations: |
|
Whiteley et al. (1989)
Ultrasonographic appearance of primary and metastatic canine hepatic tumors. A review of 48 cases
Aim: To characterise ultrasonographic patterns of primary and metastatic hepatic tumours in dogs and relate them to tumour types.
Population: |
Dogs with primary and metastatic hepatic neoplasia. Location: University of Minnesota, Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Saint Paul, USA. |
|---|---|
Sample size: |
48 dogs. |
Intervention details: |
|
Study design: |
Retrospective study. |
Outcome Studied: |
Ultrasonographic patterns associated with different types of hepatic neoplasms, including primary and metastatic tumours. |
Main Findings |
|
Limitations: |
|
Wrigley et al. (1988)
Ultrasonographic features of splenic lymphosarcoma in dogs: 12 cases (1980-1986)
Aim: To describe the ultrasonographic characteristics of splenic lymphosarcoma in dogs and their usefulness for guiding cytologic or histologic confirmation.
Population: |
Dogs with histologically confirmed splenic lymphosarcoma. Location: Colorado State University, Fort Collins, USA. |
|---|---|
Sample size: |
12 dogs. |
Intervention details: |
|
Study design: |
Retrospective study. |
Outcome Studied: |
Ultrasonographic patterns observed in splenic lymphosarcoma including nodule characteristics and spleen echogenicity. |
Main Findings |
|
Limitations: |
|
Appraisal, application and reflection
The reviewed papers provide valuable insights into the use of abdominal ultrasound for detecting round cell neoplasia (including mast cell tumours and lymphoma) in the liver and spleen of dogs. Although the studies varied in focus and methodology, they converge on several key points that are relevant to the PICO question.
The consensus amongst the studies is that ultrasonography is limited as a standalone diagnostic tool for the detection of round cell neoplasia in the liver and spleen of dogs. While it can provide useful preliminary information (for example, a honeycomb-like echotexture of the spleen is highly suggestive of lymphoma in dogs, as noted in Wrigley et al. (1988). In addition, hypoechoic nodules in the liver and spleen may indicate mast cell infiltration, as described in Sato & Solano, (2004), its limitations necessitate a multimodal approach including cytology or histopathology to reach an accurate diagnosis. For instance, Book et al. (2011) advocate for routine splenic aspiration in cases of aggressive mast cell tumours, regardless of the ultrasonographic appearance, due to the low sensitivity of ultrasound (43% (3/7) for the spleen and 0% (0/3) for the liver). This approach aligns with the conclusion from other authors, such as Crabtree et al. (2010), who suggest performing aspirates from the spleen when abnormalities are detected, and from the liver regardless of ultrasound findings when investigating canine multicentric lymphoma.
Many of the included studies are retrospective and have small sample sizes, which limits the strength of inference. To be specific by species and study: Sato & Solano (2004) reported a retrospective case series of 19 patients comprising 12 dogs and 7 cats; Book et al. (2011) reported a retrospective study of 19 dogs; and Crabtree et al. (2010) reported a structured prospective study of 28 dogs. The inconsistency in findings across the different studies also illustrates the variability in ultrasonographic interpretations, most likely related to differences in equipment and operator expertise. For example, Feeney et al. (2008) found that ultrasonographic appearance alone was insufficient to discriminate among different types of diffuse liver diseases, including round cell neoplasia, further emphasising the need for cytological or histopathological confirmation.
From an evidence-based veterinary medicine (EBVM) perspective, the limitations of the available studies should be carefully considered when applying findings to clinical practice. The hierarchy of evidence places randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews at the top, as they provide the most reliable data with minimal bias (Howick et al., 2011). However, the majority (10/12) of the studies in this Knowledge Summary are retrospective studies, which are inherently more susceptible to selection bias, confounding variables, and inconsistent data collection. While these studies provide valuable clinical insights, they rank lower in the evidence pyramid and should ideally be supplemented with higher-level research, such as prospective cohort studies with predefined criteria for ultrasonographic abnormalities and their correlation with cytological and histopathological findings.
Another key EBVM principle relevant to this discussion is diagnostic accuracy assessment. Measures such as sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) are crucial when evaluating the reliability of ultrasound as a diagnostic tool. Many of the included studies report low sensitivity, meaning a negative ultrasound does not reliably exclude disease, while specificity varies depending on tumour type and organ involvement. For example, ultrasound sensitivity for detecting mast cell infiltration was 43% (3/7) for the spleen and 0% (0/3) for the liver (Book et al., 2011). For lymphoma, ultrasound sensitivity was 72.7% (24/33) for the liver and 100% (42/42) for the spleen, but specificity was only 23.3% (7/30) for the spleen, leading to a high rate of false positives (Crabtree et al., 2010). In Sato & Solano (2004), mast cell infiltration was found in two ultrasonographically normal livers and one spleen, further highlighting the limitations of ultrasound in ruling out disease.
The potential for operator variability further complicates the interpretation of ultrasound findings, emphasising the need for standardised training and imaging protocols to improve reproducibility and reduce diagnostic uncertainty. For example, Feeney et al. (2008) noted that subjective ultrasonographic criteria (e.g., liver echogenicity, echotexture) were insufficient to reliably distinguish between different types of liver disease, including round cell neoplasia.
Future studies should ideally focus on prospective evaluations with well-defined inclusion criteria, larger sample sizes, and blinded comparisons between ultrasound findings and histopathology to establish clearer guidelines for the use of ultrasonography in detecting round cell neoplasia in dogs. For instance, Sumping et al. (2022) demonstrated that ultrasonography had a high specificity (91.0% for the liver and 93.9% for the spleen) but low sensitivity (16.7% for the liver and 73.1% for the spleen) in detecting lymphomatous infiltration, further supporting the need for cytological or histopathological confirmation.
Thus, while ultrasonography remains a key tool in screening dogs for round cell infiltration, concomitant cytological or histological examination ensures a more reliable and comprehensive diagnostic approach. This is particularly important in cases of aggressive mast cell tumours or lymphoma, where early and accurate diagnosis can significantly impact prognosis and treatment outcomes.
Methodology
Search Strategy
Databases searched and dates covered: |
CAB Abstracts on OVID Platform (1973–Week 9 2025) |
|---|---|
Search strategy: |
CAB Abstracts:
PubMed:
|
Dates searches performed: |
1 Mar 2025 |
Exclusion / Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion: |
Does not answer the PICO question, non-English language, popular press (non-scientific or peer-reviewed), human medicine literature. |
|---|---|
Inclusion: |
Any primary veterinary research/systematic review that compared the accuracy of ultrasound compared to cytology / histopathology. |
Search Outcome
Database |
Number of results |
Excluded – did not answer the PICO question |
Excluded – conference abstracts or popular press |
Excluded – not accessible |
Total relevant papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAB Abstracts |
117 |
98 |
9 |
0 |
10 |
PubMed |
86 |
73 |
2 |
0 |
11 |
Total relevant papers when duplicates removed |
12 |
||||
ORCiD
Ernest Martinez Martinez: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8592-3989
Conflict of Interest
The author declares no conflicts of interest.
References
- Book, A.P., Fidel, J., Wills, T., Bryan, J., Sellon, R. & Mattoon, J. (2011). Correlation of ultrasound findings, liver and spleen cytology, and prognosis in the clinical staging of high metastatic risk canine mast cell tumors. Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound. 52(5), 548–554. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8261.2011.01839.x
- Crabtree, A.C., Spangler, E., Beard, D. & Smith, A. (2010). Diagnostic accuracy of gray-scale ultrasonography for the detection of hepatic and splenic lymphoma in dogs. Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound. 51(6), 661–664. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8261.2010.01725.x
- Crnogaj, M., Šmit, I., Mrljak, V., Došen, S., Hohšteter, M., Kiš, I., Grden, D., Brkljačić, M. & Gotić, J. (2021). The clinical correlation of findings obtained by fine needle fenestration biopsy of the canine spleen with visible ultrasound changes. Veterinarski Arhiv, [online] 91(5), 537–546. https://arhiva.vetarhiv.vef.unizg.hr/index.php?p1=li&p2=2021&p3=91&p4=5&p5=0&p6=0 [Accessed 25/10/2025].
- Feeney, D.A., Anderson, K.L., Ziegler, L.E., Jessen, C.R., Daubs, B.M. & Hardy, R.M. (2008). Statistical relevance of ultrasonographic criteria in the assessment of diffuse liver disease in dogs and cats. American Journal of Veterinary Research. 69(2), 212–221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.69.2.212
- Finora, K., Leibman, N.F., Fettman, M.J., Powers, B.E., Hackett, T.A. & Withrow, S.J. (2006). Cytological comparison of fine-needle aspirates of liver and spleen of normal dogs and of dogs with cutaneous mast cell tumours and an ultrasonographically normal appearing liver and spleen. Veterinary and Comparative Oncology. 4(3), 178–183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5829.2006.00107.x
- Ohlerth, S., Dennler, M., Rüefli, E., Hauser, B., Poirier, V., Siebeck, N., Roos, M. & Kaser-Hotz, B. (2008). Contrast Harmonic Imaging Characterization of Canine Splenic Lesions. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine. 22(5), 1095–1102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-1676.2008.0154.x
- Howick, J., Chalmers, I., Glasziou, P., Greenhalgh, T., Heneghan, C., Liberati, A., Moschetti, I., Phillips, B. & Thornton, H. (2011). The Oxford 2011 Levels of Evidence. Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. Available at: http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=5653 [Accessed 25/10/2025].
- Sato, A.F. & Solano, M. (2004). Ultrasonographic findings in abdominal mast cell disease: a retrospective study of 19 patients. Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound. 45(1), 51–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8261.2004.04008.x
- Stefanello, D., Valenti, P., Faverzani, S., Bronzo, V., Fiorbianco, V., Pinto da Cunha, N., Romussi, S., Cantatore, M. & Caniatti, M. (2009). Ultrasound-Guided Cytology of Spleen and Liver: A Prognostic Tool in Canine Cutaneous Mast Cell Tumor. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine. 23(5), 1051–1057. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-1676.2009.0354.x
- Sumping, J.C., Maddox, T.W., Killick, D. & Mortier, J.R. (2022). Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography to detect hepatic and splenic lymphomatous infiltration in dogs and cats. Journal of Small Animal Practice. 63(2), 113–119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jsap.13438
- Warren-Smith, C.M.R., Andrew, S., Mantis, P. & Lamb, C.R. (2012). Lack of associations between ultrasonographic appearance of parenchymal lesions of the canine liver and histological diagnosis. Journal of Small Animal Practice. 53(3), 168–173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5827.2011.01184.x
- Whiteley, M.B., Feeney, D.A., Whiteley, L.O. & Hardy, R.M. (1989). Ultrasonographic appearance of primary and metastatic canine hepatic tumors. A review of 48 cases. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. 8(11), 621–630. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.1989.8.11.621
- Wrigley, R.H., Konde, L.J., Park, R.D. & Lebel, J.L. (1988). Ultrasonographic features of splenic lymphosarcoma in dogs: 12 cases (1980-1986). Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 193(12), 1565–1568. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.1988.193.12.1565
Contribute to the evidence
There are two main ways you can contribute to the evidence base while you are enhancing your CPD:
- Tell us your information need
- Write a Knowledge Summary
Either way, you will be helping to add to the evidence base, and strengthen the decisions that veterinary professionals around the world make to give animals the best possible care. Learn more here: https://veterinaryevidence.org/index.php/ve/author-hub
Licence
Copyright (c) 2025 Ernest Martinez Martinez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Veterinary Evidence uses the Creative Commons copyright Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. That means users are free to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially – with the appropriate citation.
Intellectual Property Rights
Authors of Knowledge Summaries submitted to RCVS Knowledge for publication will retain copyright in their work, and will be required to grant to RCVS Knowledge a non-exclusive licence to publish including but not limited to the right to publish, re-publish, transmit, sell, distribute and otherwise use the materials in all languages and all media throughout the world, and to licence or permit others to do so.
Disclaimer
Knowledge Summaries are a peer-reviewed article type which aims to answer a clinical question based on the best available current evidence. It does not override the responsibility of the practitioner. Informed decisions should be made by considering such factors as individual clinical expertise and judgement along with patient’s circumstances and owners’ values. Knowledge Summaries are a resource to help inform and any opinions expressed within the Knowledge Summaries are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect the view of the RCVS Knowledge. Authors are responsible for the accuracy of the content. While the Editor and Publisher believe that all content herein are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication, they accept no legal responsibility for any errors or omissions, and make no warranty, express or implied, with respect to material contained within. For further information please refer to our Terms of Use.