The Effects of Biannual Equine Influenza Vaccine on Performance in Adult Horses
a Knowledge Summary by
Emma Shipman BVetMed, MSc, DipACVIM, CertVA, MRCVS1*
1School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Leicestershire, LE12 5RD
*Corresponding Author (emma.shipman@nottingham.ac.uk)
Vol 4, Issue 3 (2019)
Published: 26 Jul 2019
Reviewed by: Polly Compston (BSc (Hons), BVM&S, MSc, MRCVS) and Margaret Nolan (BSc, MSc, PhD)
Next review date: 01 May 2020
DOI: 10.18849/VE.V4I3.196
In three day event horses, does biannual routine influenza vaccination compared to annual routine influenza vaccination reduce performance levels?
Clinical bottom lineThere is no evidence that biannual equine influenza vaccination compared to annual booster vaccination in three day event horses is associated with reduced performance.
A group of five studies published over an 11 year period from one were evaluated. In adult warmblood horses there is weak evidence that exercise in the 28 day period post booster vaccination for equine influenza and equine herpes virus 1 and 4 (EHV1&4), is associated with changes in physical and clinical pathophysiological parameters including total red blood cell (RBC) count, neutrophil and lymphocyte count, fibrinogen concentration and serum proteins. These changes occurred at variable time points in the 14 days post exercise and values were not outside the published reference ranges for the reporting laboratories where published. Athletic performance of the horses was not evaluated.
No recommendations for equine influenza vaccination protocols in three day event horses can be made from the evidence.
The evidence
There is no retrospective or prospective evidence examining performance in three day event horses after annual or biannual booster vaccination against equine influenza virus. There is no evidence examining performance levels in three day event horses after booster vaccination against equine influenza virus. There is a small amount of evidence, and the quality of the evidence is low, evaluating clinical and clinicopathological data that may relate to performance in adult warmblood horses undergoing booster vaccination and subsequent exercise. These five randomised controlled trials were conducted at one veterinary teaching hospital using a small number of adult warmblood horses over an 11 year period. The evidence evaluated may not be applicable outside the experimental group of 15 horses and some horses may have been included in more than one of the studies.
Summary of the evidence
Population: | Adult Hanoverian geldings at one Bulgarian veterinary hospital |
Sample size: | 15 horses |
Intervention details: |
|
Study design: | Randomised controlled trial |
Outcome Studied: | Erythron parameters, heart and respiratory rates were determined 0h, 2h, and day 14 and 17 after booster vaccination and days 1, 2, 4 and 11 after commencement of exercise. Results were presented as mean +/- standard error of mean (SEM) |
Main Findings (relevant to PICO question): |
|
Limitations: |
|
Population: | Adult Hannovarian horses (4–9 years old) at one Bulgarian veterinary hospital |
Sample size: | 12 horses |
Intervention details: |
|
Study design: | Randomised controlled trial |
Outcome Studied: | Serum lysozyme, and magnitude of alternate pathway complement activation and classical pathway complement activation were determined on days 17, 18, 19, 21 and 28 after booster vaccination, corresponding to days 0, 1, 2, 4 and 11 after cessation of exercise.
Values were reported as mean +/- SEM |
Main Findings (relevant to PICO question): |
|
Limitations: |
|
Population: | Adult Hanoverian horses (4–9 years) at one Bulgarian veterinary hospital |
Sample size: | 12 horses |
Intervention details: |
|
Study design: | Randomised controlled trial |
Outcome Studied: | White blood cells (WBC), band neutrophils, segmented neutrophils, eosinophils, monocytes and lymphocytes, cortisol and antibody titers against EHV1&4 and EIV were determined on days 17, 18, 19, 21 and 28 after booster vaccination, corresponding to days 0, 1, 2, 4 and 11 after cessation of exercise.
Results were presented as mean +/- SEM |
Main Findings (relevant to PICO question): |
|
Limitations: |
|
Population: | Adult Hanoverian geldings (4–9 years of age) at one Bulgarian veterinary hospital |
Sample size: | 15 horses |
Intervention details: |
|
Study design: | Randomised controlled trial |
Outcome Studied: | Albumin, alpha, beta and gamma globulin serum protein fractions were determined in all groups on days 14 and 17, 18, 19, 21 and 28 after booster vaccination corresponding with days 1, 2, 4 and 11 after cessation of the exercise program.
Results were reported as mean +/-SEM |
Main Findings (relevant to PICO question): |
Statistically significant difference were noted for albumin, alpha 2 and beta 1 and 2 globulins between booster, vaccinated and booster, vaccinated and exercised horses at individual time points but these differences did not persist over the timeframe of the study. Beta 2 globulins were reported as reduced in the exercise group at certain time points whereas all other parameters were increased in the exercising group. All parameters remained with the published reference ranges at all time points for the reporting laboratory. |
Limitations: |
|
Population: | Adult Hanoverian geldings (4–9 years of age) at one Bulgarian veterinary hospital |
Sample size: | 15 horses |
Intervention details: |
|
Study design: | Randomised controlled trial |
Outcome Studied: | Haptoglobin, fibrinogen and erythrocyte sedimentation ratio were evaluated in all groups on days 14 and 17, 18, 19, 21 and 28 after booster vaccination, corresponding with days 1, 2, 4 and 11 after cessation of the exercise program.
Results were reported as mean +/-SEM. |
Main Findings (relevant to PICO question): |
|
Limitations: |
|
Appraisal, application and reflection
There is no evidence available comparing performance levels in three day event horses receiving either biannual or annual booster vaccinations against equine influenza virus. There is no evidence available evaluating performance levels in three day event horses receiving booster vaccination for equine influenza virus or placebo controls.
Only low quality evidence is available from a group of five papers from one veterinary teaching hospital evaluating a variety of physical and clinicopathological variables in adult warmblood horses after either booster vaccination against equine influenza virus and equine herpes virus and rest or booster vaccination followed by a controlled exercise program for 4 days commencing 14 days after vaccination. Variables evaluated included:
Statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) were noted in the above variables (*) at intermittent time points in the 14 days post exercise (corresponding to 18–31 days post booster vaccination.) Values were reported as means in all cases with mean plus standard error of mean in some publications. Confidence limits were not reported in any of the studies. Reported values remained within the published reference ranges for the conducting laboratories at all time points when these were reported in the studies. While the above variables are commonly evaluated in horses with reduced performance, athletic performance was not directly evaluated. The study participants were reported as male , male entire geldings or not reported and previous level of fitness prior to study inclusion was not discussed in any study. In all trials an exercise period of 4 days was used, which is likely to vary greatly to training programs for competing three day event horses. While all study horse were reported as being previously vaccinated for equine influenza virus and equine herpes virus 1&4 a year prior to inclusion in the trial, whether this was a booster or primary vaccine course was not discussed. All trials involved booster vaccination with an oil adjuvanted intramuscular vaccine and therefore these finding may not be relevant to horses receiving intranasal/immune stimulating complex (ISCOM) vaccines/vaccines containing varying influenza strain or vaccines containing equine influenza only.
Conclusions:
There is no evidence that biannual equine influenza vaccination compared to annual booster vaccination is associated with reduced performance in three day event horses. The quality of the data in adult warmblood horses in the 28 days period post booster vaccination where exercise occurred on days 14–17post vaccination is insufficient to determine whether athletic performance was affected during this period. More definitive conclusions on vaccination protocols in three day event horses cannot be drawn until higher quality evidence is available on the topic.
Methodology Section
Search Strategy | |
Databases searched and dates covered: | PubMed NCBI Platform 1973–2018 Week 16
CAB Abstracts on OVID Platform 1973–2018 Week 16 |
Search terms: | PubMed
CAB Abstracts
|
Dates searches performed: | 01 May 2018 |
Exclusion / Inclusion Criteria | |
Exclusion: | Non English language papers
Single case reports Book chapters and literature reviews without novel information Not relevant to the question |
Inclusion: | Papers comparing physical or clincopathological data, in sports horses exercising after revaccination for equine influenza or equine influenza and equine herpes virus 1&4 were evaluated. Due to the absence of published data in sports horses after biannual vaccination for EI, varying vaccination protocols were included. |
Search Outcome | ||||||
Database |
Number of results |
Excluded – [Non English Language] |
Excluded – [single case report] |
Excluded – [Narrative review/opinion pieces] |
Excluded – [not relevant to PICO] |
Total relevant papers |
CAB Abstracts |
188 | 37 | 2 | 5 | 139 | 5 |
NCBI Pubmed |
25 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 1 |
Total relevant papers when duplicates removed |
5 |
The author declares no conflicts of interest.
RCVS Knowledge was supported in producing this Knowledge Summary by an educational grant from Petplan Charitable Trust.
Intellectual Property Rights
Authors of Knowledge Summaries submitted to RCVS Knowledge for publication will retain copyright in their work, and will be required to grant to RCVS Knowledge a non-exclusive licence of the rights of copyright in the materials including but not limited to the right to publish, re-publish, transmit, sell, distribute and otherwise use the materials in all languages and all media throughout the world, and to licence or permit others to do so.
Disclaimer
Knowledge Summaries are a peer-reviewed article type which aims to answer a clinical question based on the best available current evidence. It does not override the responsibility of the practitioner. Informed decisions should be made by considering such factors as individual clinical expertise and judgement along with patient’s circumstances and owners’ values. Knowledge Summaries are a resource to help inform and any opinions expressed within the Knowledge Summaries are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect the view of the RCVS Knowledge. Authors are responsible for the accuracy of the content. While the Editor and Publisher believe that all content herein are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication, they accept no legal responsibility for any errors or omissions, and make no warranty, express or implied, with respect to material contained within. For further information please refer to our Terms of Use.